Leslie A Malchy1, Vicky Bungay, Joy L Johnson, Jane Buxton. 1. Nursing and Health Behaviour Research Unit, School of Nursing, 302-6190 Agronomy Rd., University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3. 44leslie@telus.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Crack smoking has increased in Vancouver despite the harms associated with its use. Many people who smoke crack share their equipment, thereby increasing their risk for infectious disease. This project explored the effects of outreach distribution of "safer crack kits" on smoking practices. METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted, the first prior to kit distribution and the second a year later. Participants were individuals who smoked crack and lived in Vancouver's inner city. Crack smoking practices and use of items in the crack kit were documented. RESULTS: The results of the second survey (i.e., following 12 months of kit distribution) showed an increase in availability and use of safer use items; mouthpieces and condoms provided in the kit were used by 79% and 59% of recipients, respectively. Unsafe practices were reported post distribution: although 42% used brass screens, the majority reported that they usually used Brillo; over 40% of respondents reported using syringe plungers to scrape crack resin; and participants reported sharing crack-use paraphernalia. CONCLUSION: While kit distribution made safer use items more accessible, its impact on safer use practice was limited. Our findings highlight the need for targeted distribution of safer use items. Future research should explore the dynamics of unsafe crack smoking practices and ways to leverage safer use messaging.
OBJECTIVES: Crack smoking has increased in Vancouver despite the harms associated with its use. Many people who smoke crack share their equipment, thereby increasing their risk for infectious disease. This project explored the effects of outreach distribution of "safer crack kits" on smoking practices. METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted, the first prior to kit distribution and the second a year later. Participants were individuals who smoked crack and lived in Vancouver's inner city. Crack smoking practices and use of items in the crack kit were documented. RESULTS: The results of the second survey (i.e., following 12 months of kit distribution) showed an increase in availability and use of safer use items; mouthpieces and condoms provided in the kit were used by 79% and 59% of recipients, respectively. Unsafe practices were reported post distribution: although 42% used brass screens, the majority reported that they usually used Brillo; over 40% of respondents reported using syringe plungers to scrape crack resin; and participants reported sharing crack-use paraphernalia. CONCLUSION: While kit distribution made safer use items more accessible, its impact on safer use practice was limited. Our findings highlight the need for targeted distribution of safer use items. Future research should explore the dynamics of unsafe crack smoking practices and ways to leverage safer use messaging.
Authors: S A Strathdee; D M Patrick; S L Currie; P G Cornelisse; M L Rekart; J S Montaner; M T Schechter; M V O'Shaughnessy Journal: AIDS Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: V Anna Gyarmathy; Alan Neaigus; Maureen Miller; Samuel R Friedman; Don C Des Jarlais Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Don C Des Jarlais; Courtney McKnight; Kamyar Arasteh; Jonathan Feelemyer; David C Perlman; Holly Hagan; Hannah L F Cooper Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2013-10-23
Authors: Karen D Ersche; Cindy C Hagan; Dana G Smith; Sanja Abbott; P Simon Jones; Annemieke M Apergis-Schoute; Rainer Döffinger Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 13.382