Literature DB >> 21714313

Occupational physical activity and body mass index (BMI) among Canadian adults: does physical activity at work help to explain the socio-economic patterning of body weight?

Amanda Barberio1, Lindsay McLaren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The behavioural and socio-cultural processes underlying the association between socio-economic position (SEP) and body mass index (BMI) remain unclear. Occupational physical activity (OPA) is one plausible explanatory variable that has not been previously considered.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To examine the association between OPA and BMI, and 2) to examine whether OPA mediates the SEP-BMI association, in a Canadian population-based sample.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on secondary analysis of the 2008 Canadian Community Health Survey data, focusing on adults (age 25-64) working at a job or business (men, n = 1,036; women, n = 936). BMI was based on measured height and weight and we derived a novel indicator of OPA from the National Occupational Classification Career Handbook. Our analytic technique was ordinary least squares regression, adjusting for a range of socio-demographic, health and behavioural covariates.
RESULTS: OPA was marginally associated with BMI in women, such that women with medium levels of OPA tended to be lighter than women with low levels of OPA, in adjusted models. No associations between OPA and BMI were detected for males. Baron and Kenny's (1986) three conditions for testing mediation were not satisfied, and thus we were unable to proceed with testing OPA as a mediator.
CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the small effects observed in women, overall the associations between OPA and BMI were neither clear nor strong, which could reflect conceptual and/or methodological reasons. Future research on this topic might incorporate other plausible explanatory variables (e.g., job-related psychosocial stress) and adopt a prospective design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21714313      PMCID: PMC6973919     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  28 in total

Review 1.  Medical consequences of obesity.

Authors:  George A Bray
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Leisure time but not occupational physical activity significantly affects cardiovascular risk factors in an adult population.

Authors:  F Sofi; A Capalbo; R Marcucci; A M Gori; S Fedi; C Macchi; A Casini; C Surrenti; R Abbate; G F Gensini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.686

3.  Relation of leisure time, occupational, domestic, and commuting physical activity to health indicators in Europe.

Authors:  Karim Abu-Omar; Alfred Rütten
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Long working hours and health.

Authors:  M Shields
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.796

Review 5.  Is alcohol consumption a risk factor for weight gain and obesity?

Authors:  Paolo M Suter
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.250

6.  Occupational sitting time and overweight and obesity in Australian workers.

Authors:  W Kerry Mummery; Grant M Schofield; Rebekah Steele; Elizabeth G Eakin; Wendy J Brown
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Adult obesity.

Authors:  Michael Tjepkema
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.796

8.  Smoking, obesity, and their co-occurrence in the United States: cross sectional analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl G Healton; Donna Vallone; Kristen L McCausland; Haijun Xiao; Molly P Green
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-12

Review 9.  A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Connor Gorber; M Tremblay; D Moher; B Gorber
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 10.  Socioeconomic status and obesity.

Authors:  Lindsay McLaren
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  2 in total

1.  The usefulness of "corrected" body mass index vs. self-reported body mass index: comparing the population distributions, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive utility of three correction equations using Canadian population-based data.

Authors:  Daniel J Dutton; Lindsay McLaren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Occupational Physical Activity and Body Mass Index: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

Authors:  Richard H Singer; Mark Stoutenberg; Marc D Gellman; Edward Archer; Sonia M Davis; Nathan Gotman; David X Marquez; Christina Buelna; Yu Deng; H Dean Hosgood; Ruth E Zambrana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.