BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate prostate movement during deep breathing and contraction of abdominal musculature by means of dynamic MRI and analyze implications for image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients and 8 healthy volunteers were examined with MRI. Images during deep respiration and during contraction of abdominal musculature (via a coughing maneuver) were obtained with dynamic two-dimensional (2D) balanced SSFP; 3 frames/s were obtained over an acquisition time of 15 s. Images were acquired in sagittal orientation to evaluate motion along both the craniocaudal (cc)-axis and anteroposterior (ap)-axis. Prostate motion was quantified semi-automatically using dedicated software tools. RESULTS: Respiratory induced mean cc-axis displacement of the prostate was 2.7 ± 1.9 (SD) mm (range, 0.5-10.6 mm) and mean ap-axis displacement 1.8 ± 1.0 (SD) mm (range, 0.3-10 mm). In 69% of the subjects, breathing-related prostate movements were found to be negligible (< 3 mm). The prostate displacement for abdominal contraction was significantly higher: mean cc-axis displacement was max. 8.4 ± 6.7 (SD) mm (range, 0.6-27 mm); mean anteroposterior movement was 8.3 ± 7.7 (SD) mm (range, 0.7-26 mm). CONCLUSION: Dynamic MRI is an excellent tool for noninvasive real-time imaging of prostate movement. Further investigations regarding possible applications in image-guided radiotherapy, e.g., for individualized planning and in integrated linac/MRI systems, are warranted.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate prostate movement during deep breathing and contraction of abdominal musculature by means of dynamic MRI and analyze implications for image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients and 8 healthy volunteers were examined with MRI. Images during deep respiration and during contraction of abdominal musculature (via a coughing maneuver) were obtained with dynamic two-dimensional (2D) balanced SSFP; 3 frames/s were obtained over an acquisition time of 15 s. Images were acquired in sagittal orientation to evaluate motion along both the craniocaudal (cc)-axis and anteroposterior (ap)-axis. Prostate motion was quantified semi-automatically using dedicated software tools. RESULTS: Respiratory induced mean cc-axis displacement of the prostate was 2.7 ± 1.9 (SD) mm (range, 0.5-10.6 mm) and mean ap-axis displacement 1.8 ± 1.0 (SD) mm (range, 0.3-10 mm). In 69% of the subjects, breathing-related prostate movements were found to be negligible (< 3 mm). The prostate displacement for abdominal contraction was significantly higher: mean cc-axis displacement was max. 8.4 ± 6.7 (SD) mm (range, 0.6-27 mm); mean anteroposterior movement was 8.3 ± 7.7 (SD) mm (range, 0.7-26 mm). CONCLUSION: Dynamic MRI is an excellent tool for noninvasive real-time imaging of prostate movement. Further investigations regarding possible applications in image-guided radiotherapy, e.g., for individualized planning and in integrated linac/MRI systems, are warranted.
Authors: Maximilian I Ruge; Martin Kocher; Mohammad Maarouf; Christina Hamisch; Harald Treuer; Jürgen Voges; Volker Sturm Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: May N Tsao; Nancy S Lloyd; Rebecca K S Wong; Eileen Rakovitch; Edward Chow; Normand Laperriere Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: C Y Shiau; P K Sneed; H K Shu; K R Lamborn; M W McDermott; S Chang; P Nowak; P L Petti; V Smith; L J Verhey; M Ho; E Park; W M Wara; P H Gutin; D A Larson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Andrew E Sloan; Faith G Davis; Fawn D Vigneau; Ping Lai; Raymond E Sawaya Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David W Andrews; Charles B Scott; Paul W Sperduto; Adam E Flanders; Laurie E Gaspar; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; William Demas; Janice Ryu; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marvin Rotman; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rogier R Wildeboer; Ruud J G van Sloun; Arnoud W Postema; Christophe K Mannaerts; Maudy Gayet; Harrie P Beerlage; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2018-07-30