| Literature DB >> 21713138 |
Sanjib Bhattacharya1, Pallab K Haldar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trichosanthes dioica Roxb. (Cucurbitaceae), called pointed gourd in English is a dioecious climber grown in India and used traditionally for various medicinal purposes.Entities:
Keywords: Allium cepa; antimitotic; cytotoxic; root
Year: 2010 PMID: 21713138 PMCID: PMC3111694 DOI: 10.4103/0974-8490.75454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacognosy Res ISSN: 0974-8490
Influence of DCTD on root length, root number and mitotic index of Allium cepa roots
| Concentration (mg/ml) | Mean root ength ± SEM | Mean root number ± SEM | Mitotic index (%) ± SEM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (tap water) | 31.7 ± 0.13 | 31.1 ± 0.23 | 64.6 ± 0.41 |
| 1 | 21.8 ± 0.27 | 30.7 ± 0.52 | 54.3 ± 0.19 |
| 2 | 17.3 ± 0.30 | 24.6 ± 0.18 | 41.2 ± 0.27 |
| 4 | 13.6 ± 0.38 | 18.2 ± 0.45 | 28.5 ± 0.36 |
| 8 | 9.6 ± 0.49 | 13.1 ± 0.20 | 16.2 ± 0.51 |
| 16 | 6.7 ± 0.62 | 11.2 ± 0.37 | 4.2 ± 0.45 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 12);
P < 0.05 and
P < 0.001 compared to control.
Influence of AQTD on root length, root number and mitotic index of Allium cepa roots
| Concentration (mg/ml) | Mean root ength ± SEM | Mean root number ± SEM | Mitotic index (%) ± SEM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (tap water) | 30.7 ± 0.41 | 32.1 ± 0.44 | 62.9 ± 0.46 |
| 100 | 30.2 ± 0.17 | 29.9 ± 0.34 | 61.1 ± 0.37 |
| 200 | 24.5 ± 0.33 | 27.2 ± 0.11 | 50.2 ± 0.09 |
| 400 | 16.8 ± 0.22 | 21.2 ± 0.26 | 42.3 ± 0.32 |
| 800 | 16.2 ± 0.25 | 20.3 ± 0.42 | 41.4 ± 0.18 |
| 1600 | 16.2 ± 0.20 | 20.1 ± 0.10 | 41.1 ± 0.31 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 12);
P < 0.05 and
P < 0.001 compared to control.
Influence of METD on root length, root number and mitotic index of Allium cepa roots
| Concentration (mg/ml) | Mean root ength ± SEM | Mean root number ± SEM | Mitotic index (%) ± SEM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (tap water) | 30.4 ± 0.09 | 34.01 ± 0.22 | 63.7 ± 0.29 |
| 20 | 27.5 ± 0.25 | 27.2 ± 0.13 | 57.2 ± 0.30 |
| 40 | 22.2 ± 0.16 | 25.1 ± 0.32 | 44.6 ± 0.24 |
| 80 | 18.7 ± 0.20 | 21.2 ± 0.48 | 40.2 ± 0.15 |
| 160 | 12.2 ± 0.34 | 15.1 ± 0.28 | 25.7 ± 0.55 |
| 320 | 11.6 ± 0.23 | 14.8 ± 0.30 | 24.2 ± 0.39 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 12);
P < 0.05 and
P < 0.001 compared to control.