Literature DB >> 21712802

Optimized PCR-based detection of mycoplasma.

Paige L Dobrovolny1, Dan Bess.   

Abstract

The maintenance of contamination-free cell lines is essential to cell-based research. Among the biggest contaminant concerns are mycoplasma contamination. Although mycoplasma do not usually kill contaminated cells, they are difficult to detect and can cause a variety of effects on cultured cells, including altered metabolism, slowed proliferation and chromosomal aberrations. In short, mycoplasma contamination compromises the value of those cell lines in providing accurate data for life science research. The sources of mycoplasma contamination in the laboratory are very challenging to completely control. As certain mycoplasma species are found on human skin, they can be introduced through poor aseptic technique. Additionally, they can come from contaminated supplements such as fetal bovine serum, and most importantly from other contaminated cell cultures. Once mycoplasma contaminates a culture, it can quickly spread to contaminate other areas of the lab. Strict adherence to good laboratory practices such as good aseptic technique are key, and routine testing for mycoplasma is highly recommended for successful control of mycoplasma contamination. PCR-based detection of mycoplasma has become a very popular method for routine cell line maintenance. PCR-based detection methods are highly sensitive and can provide rapid results, which allows researchers to respond quickly to isolate and eliminate contamination once it is detected in comparison to the time required using microbiological techniques. The LookOut Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit is highly sensitive, with a detection limit of only 2 genomes per μl. Taking advantage of the highly specific JumpStart Taq DNA Polymerase and a proprietary primer design, false positives are greatly reduced. The convenient 8-tube format, strips pre-coated with dNTPs, and associated primers helps increase the throughput to meet the needs of customers with larger collections of cell lines. Given the extreme sensitivity of the kit, great care must be taken to prevent inadvertent contamination of samples and reagents. The step-by-step protocol we demonstrate highlights the precautions and practices required for reliable mycoplasma detection. We also show and discuss typical results and their interpretation. Our goal is to ensure the success of researchers using the LookOut Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21712802      PMCID: PMC3197068          DOI: 10.3791/3057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  3 in total

1.  Application of cell culture enrichment for improving the sensitivity of mycoplasma detection methods based on nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT).

Authors:  Hyesuk Kong; Dmitriy V Volokhov; Joseph George; Pranvera Ikonomi; Donna Chandler; Christine Anderson; Vladimir Chizhikov
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Mycoplasma testing of cell substrates and biologics: Review of alternative non-microbiological techniques.

Authors:  Dmitriy V Volokhov; Laurie J Graham; Kurt A Brorson; Vladimir E Chizhikov
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Specificity and sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with other methods for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell lines.

Authors:  A Hopert; C C Uphoff; M Wirth; H Hauser; H G Drexler
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1993-08-26       Impact factor: 2.303

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Combination immunotherapy including OncoVEXmGMCSF creates a favorable tumor immune micro-environment in transgenic BRAF murine melanoma.

Authors:  Zoë Blake; Robyn D Gartrell; Emanuelle M Rizk; Rolando Perez-Lorenzo; Stuart P Weisberg; Ines Simoes; Camden Esancy; Yichun Fu; Danielle R Davari; Luke Barker; Grace Finkel; Manas Mondal; Hanna E Minns; Samuel W Wang; Benjamin T Fullerton; Francisco Lozano; Codruta Chiuzan; Basil Horst; Yvonne M Saenger
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 6.630

2.  RBM5-AS1 Is Critical for Self-Renewal of Colon Cancer Stem-like Cells.

Authors:  Serena Di Cecilia; Fan Zhang; Ana Sancho; SiDe Li; Francesca Aguiló; Yifei Sun; Madhumitha Rengasamy; Weijia Zhang; Luigi Del Vecchio; Francesco Salvatore; Martin J Walsh
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  L-WRN conditioned medium for gastrointestinal epithelial stem cell culture shows replicable batch-to-batch activity levels across multiple research teams.

Authors:  Kelli L VanDussen; Naomi M Sonnek; Thaddeus S Stappenbeck
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.020

4.  Detection of mycoplasma in contaminated mammalian cell culture using FTIR microspectroscopy.

Authors:  Katia Wehbe; Marzia Vezzalini; Gianfelice Cinque
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Metabolic profile and differentiation potential of extraembryonic endoderm-like cells.

Authors:  Mohamed I Gatie; Gregory M Kelly
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2018-09-26

Review 6.  Non-Viral in Vitro Gene Delivery: It is Now Time to Set the Bar!

Authors:  Nina Bono; Federica Ponti; Diego Mantovani; Gabriele Candiani
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 6.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.