Literature DB >> 21712501

Effect of a tailored behavior change program on a composite lifestyle change score: a randomized controlled trial.

N Jacobs1, E Clays, D De Bacquer, G De Backer, P Dendale, H Thijs, I de Bourdeaudhuij, N Claes.   

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of a tailored behavior change program on a composite lifestyle change score. A randomized controlled trial conducted in Belgium in 2007-08 with 314 participants allocated to a control and an intervention condition. The intervention was a tailored behavior change program (web-based and individual coaching). The dose of the coaching was chosen by the participants and registered. Outcome measures were weight, saturated fat intake, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity, smoking status and a composite lifestyle change score. Mann-Whitney U-tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, t-tests and one-way analyses of variance were used to compare the study conditions and three intervention dose groups (no/low, medium and high intervention dose). There were no significant differences between the study conditions or between the intervention dose groups for the individual lifestyle factors. The composite lifestyle change score was significantly higher in the high intervention dose group compared with the no/low intervention dose group (P = 0.009). The composite lifestyle change score was positively related to the intervention dose, while the individual lifestyle factors were not. Behavior change programs that target multiple lifestyle factors could be evaluated by using a composite lifestyle change score taking into account the intervention dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21712501     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyr046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  6 in total

1.  When it comes to lifestyle recommendations, more is sometimes less: a meta-analysis of theoretical assumptions underlying the effectiveness of interventions promoting multiple behavior domain change.

Authors:  Kristina Wilson; Ibrahim Senay; Marta Durantini; Flor Sánchez; Michael Hennessy; Bonnie Spring; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Gemma M J Taylor; Michael N Dalili; Monika Semwal; Marta Civljak; Aziz Sheikh; Josip Car
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-04

3.  Social influence as a driver of engagement in a web-based health intervention.

Authors:  Josée Poirier; Nathan K Cobb
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  Obesity in achondroplasia patients: from evidence to medical monitoring.

Authors:  Celine Saint-Laurent; Laura Garde-Etayo; Elvire Gouze
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.123

5.  Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.

Authors:  Kath Wright; Su Golder; Rocio Rodriguez-Lopez
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.

Authors:  Georgina MacArthur; Deborah M Caldwell; James Redmore; Sarah H Watkins; Ruth Kipping; James White; Catherine Chittleborough; Rebecca Langford; Vanessa Er; Raghu Lingam; Keryn Pasch; David Gunnell; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.