Literature DB >> 21712483

Quality of life and clinical outcome comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Matjaz Sajovic1, Andrej Strahovnik, Mojca Z Dernovsek, Katja Skaza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are still controversies about graft selection for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Prospective, randomized long-term studies are needed to determine the differences between the graft materials. HYPOTHESIS: Eleven years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction there is no difference in functional outcome and quality of life between patients with patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autografts; however, the patients with patellar tendon autograft would have a higher prevalence of osteoarthritis. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: From June 1999 to March 2000, 64 patients were included in this prospective study. A single surgeon performed primary arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in an alternating sequence. In 32 patients, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed with hamstring tendon autograft (semitendinosus and gracilis [STG] group) while in the other 32 patients the reconstruction was performed with patellar tendon autograft (PT group).
RESULTS: At the 11-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the Lysholm score and Short Form-36, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity testing, anterior knee pain, single-legged hop test, or International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) classification results. Positive pivot-shift test (1+) was significantly more frequent in the PT group (P = .036). Twenty-two patients (81%) in the STG group and 18 patients (72%) in the PT group were still at their preinjury level of activity. Graft rupture occurred in 2 patients from the STG group (6%) and in 4 patients from the PT (12%). Grade B and C abnormal radiographic findings were seen in 84% (21 of 25) of patients in the PT group and in 63% (17 of 27) of patients in the STG group (P = .008).
CONCLUSION: Both hamstring and patellar tendon autografts provided good subjective outcomes and objective stability at 11 years. Positive pivot-shift test (1+) was significantly more frequent in the PT group. No significant differences in the rate of graft failure were identified. Patients with patellar tendon graft had a greater prevalence of osteoarthritis at 11 years after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21712483     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511411702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  40 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Anita Sole; Torbjørn Strand; Gisle Uppheim; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Femoral fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in ACL reconstructions: the 2-year follow-up results of a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Jon Olav Drogset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Grete Sofie Hortemo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis 12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Britt Elin Øiestad; Inger Holm; Lars Engebretsen; Arne Kristian Aune; Ragnhild Gunderson; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Finite element simulations of different hamstring tendon graft lengths and related fixations in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chao Wan; Zhixiu Hao; Zhichang Li; Jianhao Lin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis After Surgical or Nonsurgical Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kyle P Harris; Jeffrey B Driban; Michael R Sitler; Nicole M Cattano; Easwaran Balasubramanian; Jennifer M Hootman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Jeff R S Leiter; Robert Gourlay; Sheila McRae; Nevin de Korompay; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Fibrin gels exhibit improved biological, structural, and mechanical properties compared with collagen gels in cell-based tendon tissue-engineered constructs.

Authors:  Andrew P Breidenbach; Nathaniel A Dyment; Yinhui Lu; Marepalli Rao; Jason T Shearn; David W Rowe; Karl E Kadler; David L Butler
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Five-strand hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyle P Lavery; Jeffrey F Rasmussen; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-07-07

Review 9.  Credibility and quality of meta-analyses addressing graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Kurz; Nathan Evaniew; Marco Yeung; Kristian Samuelsson; Devin Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament: Physiology, rupture and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Christoph Domnick; Michael J Raschke; Mirco Herbort
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.