Literature DB >> 21712464

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT with bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis: a meta-analysis.

Xu Cheng1, Yongjun Li, Zhaoqiang Xu, Lihua Bao, Dianfu Li, Jie Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The skeleton is one of the favorable sites for the metastasis of almost all human malignant neoplasms. An accurate diagnosis of bone metastasis is crucial for the patient's staging and management.
PURPOSE: To investigate and compare diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS) for detection of bone metastasis in malignancies using meta-analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed (Medline included) was searched for relevant articles. We assessed the methodological quality with Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) score tool, and used statistical software to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve.
RESULTS: Six studies met inclusion criteria. For 18F-FDG PET/CT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.934 and 0.975, respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 34.990, 0.068 and 559.02, respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.9854. For BS, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR + , LR- and DOR were 0.706 (0.642-0.764), 0.911 (0.896-0.926), 13.982 (2.419-80.817), 0.319 (0.143-0.712), and 60.420 (21.393-170.64), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.9386.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that 18F-FDG PET/CT do have both higher sensitivity and specificity than bone scintigraphy for detecting metastatic bone tumor. However, further research is needed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and BS in each common malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21712464     DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.110115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

1.  Distinguishing imaging features between spinal hyperplastic hematopoietic bone marrow and bone metastasis.

Authors:  Y Shigematsu; T Hirai; K Kawanaka; S Shiraishi; M Yoshida; M Kitajima; H Uetani; M Azuma; Y Iryo; Y Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Esophageal Cancer with Bone Marrow Hyperplasia Mimicking Bone Metastasis: Report of a Case.

Authors:  Hiromi Yasuda; Tadanobu Shimura; Masato Okigami; Shigeyuki Yoshiyama; Masaki Ohi; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2016-11-07

3.  Diagnostic performance of choline PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Guo; Ling Wang; Junjie Hu; Dehong Feng; Lijuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Multimodal Imaging-Based Potential Visualization of the Tumor Microenvironment in Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Jang Bae Moon; Su Woong Yoo; Changho Lee; Dong-Yeon Kim; Ayoung Pyo; Seong Young Kwon
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  The development of musculoskeletal radiology for 100 years as presented in the pages of Acta Radiologica.

Authors:  Mats Geijer; Fatih Inci; Nektarios Solidakis; Pawel Szaro; Bariq Al-Amiry
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Diagnostic Role of (18)F-FECH-PET/CT Compared with Bone Scan in Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Patients Referring with Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Mustafa Takesh; Khaldoun Odat Allh; Stefan Adams; Christian Zechmann
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28

7.  Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  W Annefloor van Enst; Eleanor Ochodo; Rob J P M Scholten; Lotty Hooft; Mariska M Leeflang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.