AIMS: To compare quality of life (QoL) in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) and HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) in a well-defined HF population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HF-PEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40%] were matched by age and gender to patients with HF-REF (LVEF <40%). In the current study, we only included HF patients with a B-type natriuretic peptide level (BNP) >100 pg/mL. Quality of life was assessed by Cantril's Ladder of Life, RAND-36, and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, and impairment of QoL was adjusted for by BNP as a marker for severity of HF. We examined a total of 290 HF patients, of whom 145 had HF-PEF (41% female; age 72 ± 10; LVEF 51 ± 8%) and 145 had HF-REF (41% female; age 73 ± 10, LVEF 26 ± 7%). All HF patients reported markedly low scores of QoL, both on the general and disease-specific QoL questionnaires. Quality of life between patients with HF-PEF and HF-REF did not differ significantly. When adjusting the QoL scores for BNP, an association between QoL and LVEF was not found, i.e. patients with HF-PEF and HF-REF with similar BNP levels had the same impairment in QoL. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is similarly impaired in patients with HF-PEF as in HF-REF. These findings further support the need for more pharmacological and non-pharmacological studies in patients with HF-PEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 98675639.
AIMS: To compare quality of life (QoL) in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) and HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) in a well-defined HF population. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with HF-PEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40%] were matched by age and gender to patients with HF-REF (LVEF <40%). In the current study, we only included HF patients with a B-type natriuretic peptide level (BNP) >100 pg/mL. Quality of life was assessed by Cantril's Ladder of Life, RAND-36, and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, and impairment of QoL was adjusted for by BNP as a marker for severity of HF. We examined a total of 290 HF patients, of whom 145 had HF-PEF (41% female; age 72 ± 10; LVEF 51 ± 8%) and 145 had HF-REF (41% female; age 73 ± 10, LVEF 26 ± 7%). All HF patients reported markedly low scores of QoL, both on the general and disease-specific QoL questionnaires. Quality of life between patients with HF-PEF and HF-REF did not differ significantly. When adjusting the QoL scores for BNP, an association between QoL and LVEF was not found, i.e. patients with HF-PEF and HF-REF with similar BNP levels had the same impairment in QoL. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is similarly impaired in patients with HF-PEF as in HF-REF. These findings further support the need for more pharmacological and non-pharmacological studies in patients with HF-PEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 98675639.
Authors: Buntaro Fujita; Marcus Franz; Bjoern Goebel; Michael Fritzenwanger; Hans R Figulla; Friedhelm Kuethe; Markus Ferrari; Christian Jung Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Sanjiv J Shah; John F Heitner; Nancy K Sweitzer; Inder S Anand; Hae-Young Kim; Brian Harty; Robin Boineau; Nadine Clausell; Akshay S Desai; Rafael Diaz; Jerome L Fleg; Ivan Gordeev; Eldrin F Lewis; Valetin Markov; Eileen O'Meara; Bondo Kobulia; Tamaz Shaburishvili; Scott D Solomon; Bertram Pitt; Marc A Pfeffer; Rebecca Li Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Susan M Joseph; Eric Novak; Suzanne V Arnold; Philip G Jones; Himad Khattak; Anne E Platts; Victor G Dávila-Román; Douglas L Mann; John A Spertus Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 8.790