Literature DB >> 21712237

Impact of variable [CO2] and temperature on water transport structure-function relationships in Eucalyptus.

Nathan G Phillips1, Renee D Attard, Oula Ghannoum, James D Lewis, Barry A Logan, David T Tissue.   

Abstract

Nearly 30 years ago, Whitehead and Jarvis and Whitehead et al. postulated an elegant mechanistic explanation for the observed relationship between tree hydraulic structure and function, hypothesizing that structural adjustments promote physiological homeostasis. To date, this framework has been nearly completely overlooked with regard to varying atmospheric carbon dioxide ([CO(2)]). Here, we evaluated Whitehead's hypothesis of leaf water potential (Ψ(l)) homeostasis in faster-growing (Eucalyptus saligna) and slower-growing (Eucalyptus sideroxylon) tree saplings grown under three [CO(2)] (pre-industrial, current and future) and two temperature (ambient and ambient + 4°C) treatments. We tested for relationships between physiological (stomatal conductance and Ψ(l)) and structural (leaf and sapwood areas (A(l), A(s)), height (h), xylem conductivity (k(s))) plant variables as a function of the [CO(2)] and temperature treatments to assess whether structural variables adjusted to maintain physiological homeostasis. Structural components (A(l), A(s), h) generally increased with [CO(2)] or temperature, while g(s) was negatively correlated with [CO(2)]. Contrary to Whitehead's hypothesis, Ψ(l) did not exhibit homeostasis in either species; elevated temperatures were associated with more negative Ψ(l) in faster-growing E. saligna, and less negative Ψ(l) in slower-growing E. sideroxylon. Moreover, individual structural variables were generally uncorrelated with Ψ(l). However, across both species, the integrated hydraulic property of leaf specific hydraulic conductance (K(l)) was positively correlated with an independent calculation of K(l) determined exclusively from leaf physiological variables. These results suggest that physiological homeostasis may not apply to saplings exposed to global change drivers including [CO(2)] and temperature. Nevertheless, Whitehead et al.'s formulation identified K(l) as a sensitive measure of plant structural-physiological co-variation across species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21712237     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  2 in total

1.  Effects of temperature on leaf hydraulic architecture of tobacco plants.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Qiu-Yun Yang; Wei Huang; Shi-Bao Zhang; Hong Hu
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Increasing atmospheric [CO2] from glacial to future concentrations affects drought tolerance via impacts on leaves, xylem and their integrated function.

Authors:  Juliana S Medeiros; Joy K Ward
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 10.151

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.