Literature DB >> 21711964

High-definition imaging in endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

Jens Conrad1, Mark Philipps, Joachim Oertel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transsphenoidal approach to sellar lesions has evolved enormously since its first description in the early 20th century. Endoscopic surgical strategies have become an integral part of the surgical armamentarium. More recently, high-definition (HD) digital cameras with better image resolution were introduced, although their value for the surgical procedure remains equivocal. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of a standard-definition (SD) camera with a new HD camera.
METHODS: A transsphenoidal pituitary adenomectomy was recorded simultaneously in HD and SD resolution. Eight experienced neurosurgeons were asked to identify predefined as well as not predefined anatomic structures in HD and SD. Additionally, the video quality of three complementary surgical sequences was rated with grades from 1 ("very good") to 6 ("poor").
RESULTS: An average of 23.6 ± 2.7 predefined structures (84.38%) were identified in HD versus 17.6 ± 4.4 predefined structures (62.95%) identified in SD. This profound difference in the recognition of anatomic structures reached statistical significance (p = 0.012). Subjective impression of video quality was rated 1.9, 1.9, and 1.4 for the videos in HD and 3.5, 3.3, and 3.5 for the complementary videos in SD. These differences also reached statistical significance (p ≤ 0.005).
CONCLUSION: HD imaging in endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery accounts for significantly better identification of anatomic structures in comparison with SD images. Additionally, the subjective impression of video quality is significantly better in HD. This improved intraoperative orientation by better digital image quality might contribute to reduce the gap in intraoperative visual accuracy between microsurgery and endoscopy in pituitary surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21711964     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.25.3542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  6 in total

1.  Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to sellar lesions: a detailed account of our mononostril technique.

Authors:  Stefan Linsler; Michael Robert Gaab; Joachim Oertel
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-03-19

2.  Incidental sinonasal findings identified during preoperative evaluation for endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches.

Authors:  Adrienne M Laury; Nelson M Oyesiku; Costas G Hadjipanayis; John M Delgaudio; Sarah K Wise
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.467

3.  Endoscopic and keyhole endoscope-assisted neurosurgical approaches: a qualitative survey on technical challenges and technological solutions.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Thomas P Cundy; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Dipankar Nandi
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 4.  Johannes Vermeer of Delft [1632-1675] and vision in neuroendoscopy.

Authors:  Waleed A Azab; Daniel M Prevedello; Ricardo L Carrau
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-08-05

5.  Comparative effectiveness of 3-dimensional vs 2-dimensional and high-definition vs standard-definition neuroendoscopy: a preclinical randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Thomas P Cundy; Aimee Di Marco; Philip Pratt; Dipankar Nandi; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Seung-Kook Kim; Sang-Soo Kang; Young-Ho Hong; Seung-Woo Park; Su-Chan Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.