Literature DB >> 21711404

Intoxicated workers: findings from a national Australian survey.

Ken Pidd1, Ann M Roche, Femke Buisman-Pijlman.   

Abstract

AIMS: To identify prevalence of alcohol and drug use and intoxication at work. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9,828 Australian workers ≥14 years old.
SETTING: Australia 2007. MEASUREMENTS: Work-place alcohol use and drug use, intoxication at work, industry and occupation of employment.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a large nationally representative survey involving descriptive and weighted multivariate logistic regressions.
FINDINGS: Differential patterns were identified by drug type, worker characteristics and occupational setting, controlling for demographic variables. Nearly 9% of workers surveyed (8.7%) usually drank alcohol at work and 0.9% usually used drugs at work. Attending work under the influence of alcohol was more prevalent (5.6%) than attending work under the influence of drugs (2.0%), and significantly more likely among young, male, never married workers with no dependent children. Hospitality industry workers were 3.5 times more likely than other workers to drink alcohol and two to three times more likely to use drugs at work or attend work under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Other high-risk industries and occupations included construction, financial services, tradespersons and unskilled workers.
CONCLUSION: More than one in 20 Australian workers admit to having worked under the influence of alcohol and almost one in 50 report attending work under the influence of psychoactive drugs. The rates are higher for some industries, such as the hospitality industry, than others.
© 2011 The Authors, Addiction © 2011 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21711404     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03462.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  8 in total

1.  Cross-National Comparisons and Correlates of Harms From the Drinking of People With Whom You Work.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Laslett; Oliver Stanesby; Sharon Wilsnack; Robin Room; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Alcohol related work place injuries: More Questions than Answers!

Authors:  David Mountain
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

3.  Use of alcohol and drugs by employees in selected business areas in Norway: a study using oral fluid testing and questionnaires.

Authors:  Hilde Marie Erøy Edvardsen; Inger Synnøve Moan; Asbjørg S Christophersen; Hallvard Gjerde
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.646

Review 4.  Prefrontal electrical stimulation in non-depressed reduces levels of reported negative affects from daily stressors.

Authors:  Nick J Davis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A National survey on substance use among Iranian industrial workers.

Authors:  Behzad Damari; Hamid Sarami; Siamak Alikhani; Hossein Mirzaei
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-03-14

6.  "We're supposed to be a family here": An ethnography of preserving, achieving, and performing normality within methamphetamine recovery.

Authors:  Samuel Brookfield; Lisa Fitzgerald; Linda Selvey; Lisa Maher
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-11-19

7.  Social and public health implications of the legalisation of recreational cannabis: A literature review.

Authors:  Kebogile Mokwena
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2019-11-19

8.  Risk Factors for the Number of Sustained Injuries in Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Operation.

Authors:  Michael M Ajith; Apurna K Ghosh; Janis Jansz
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-01-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.