Literature DB >> 21711075

Advancing performance measurement in oncology.

Francis X Campion1, Leanne R Larson, Pamela J Kadlubek, Craig C Earle, Michael N Neuss.   

Abstract

The American healthcare system, including the cancer care system, is under pressure to improve patient outcomes and lower the cost of care. Government payers have articulated an interest in partnering with the private sector to create learning communities to measure quality and improve the value of healthcare. In 2006, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) unveiled the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI), which has become a key component of the measurement system to promote quality cancer care. QOPI is a physician-led, voluntary, practice-based, quality-improvement program, using performance measurement and benchmarking among oncology practices across the United States. Since its inception, ASCO's QOPI has grown steadily to include 973 practices as of November 2010. One key area that QOPI has addressed is end-of-life care. During the most recent data collection cycle in the fall of 2010, those practices completing multiple data collection cycles had better performance on care of pain compared with sites participating for the first time (62.61% vs 46.89%). Similarly, repeat QOPI participants demonstrated meaningfully better performance than their peers in the rate of documenting discussions of hospice and palliative care (62.42% vs 54.65%) and higher rates of hospice enrollment. QOPI demonstrates how a strong performance measurement program can lead to improved quality and value of care for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21711075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  5 in total

Review 1.  A way forward on the medically appropriate use of white cell growth factors.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The Victorian Lung Cancer Registry pilot: improving the quality of lung cancer care through the use of a disease quality registry.

Authors:  Rob G Stirling; S M Evans; P McLaughlin; M Senthuren; J Millar; J Gooi; L Irving; P Mitchell; A Haydon; J Ruben; M Conron; T Leong; N Watkins; J J McNeil
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 3.  Methods for improving the quality of palliative care delivery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Rebecca A Aslakson; Renee F Wilson; Oluwakemi A Fawole; Colleen C Apostol; Kathryn A Martinez; Daniela Vollenweider; Eric B Bass; Sydney E Morss Dy
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Association between compliance with quality indicators and hospitalisation expenses in patients with heart failure: a retrospective study using quantile regression model in China.

Authors:  Rong Fu; Shaodan Feng; Yilong Wu; Fei He; Zheng Lin; Yixian Jiang; Zhijian Hu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Claire Willmington; Paolo Belardi; Anna Maria Murante; Milena Vainieri
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.