| Literature DB >> 21709636 |
Levente Kiss1, Rita Benko, Endre Kovács, Tamás Szerafin, Katalin Módis, Csaba Szabó, Zsombor Lacza.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The internal thoracic artery (ITA) is the first choice for myocardial revascularization, but atherosclerotic lesions and perioperative vasospasm may still limit its functionality. Oxidative stress via the peroxynitrite - poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cascade plays an important role in the pathogenesis of impaired vascular tone via endothelial injury. We aimed to investigate and describe the histology, PARP activation and functionality of ITA grafts and to assess the possible beneficial effect of PARP-inhibition. MATERIAL/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21709636 PMCID: PMC3539564 DOI: 10.12659/msm.881853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Histological and immunohistochemical results (40× magnification). (A) Internal thoracic artery segment showing intimal thickening, smooth muscle cell migration, foam-cell formation (arrows). Oxidative and nitrosative stress were evidenced by the positive 3-nitrotyrosine (B) and 4-hydroxynonenal (C) staining. PARP activation (D) was detected in all of the investigated segments (arrows indicate specific stainings).
Figure 2Functional characteristics of internal thoracic artery ring segments. (A) Out of 67 segments 59 (88.1%) reacted to K-Krebs, 46 (68.7%) exhibited contraction after 1 μM phenylephrine. All precontracted segments relaxed to SNP, but only 20 (29.9%) had any measurable relaxation to Ach. Data expressed as percentage of all segments. (B) Representative recording of the inhibitory effect of 10 μM sodium-nitroprusside on spasmic vasomotion.
Figure 3(A) Vessels precontracted with phenylephrine showed only a modest dilation to 30 μM Ach, while these vessels readily reacted to the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium-nitroprusside at 10 μM. (B) Incubation of the preparations with 1 μM PJ34 PARP inhibitor did not improve vasodilation to Ach in our experimental conditions. Data expressed as mean±SEM (n=5 patients/group). For clarity, SEM values are not shown when no significant difference was found.