Literature DB >> 21709597

Epidural cortical stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for refractory major depressive disorder.

Brian Harris Kopell1, Jerry Halverson, Christopher R Butson, Mercedes Dickinson, Julie Bobholz, Harold Harsch, Charles Rainey, Douglas Kondziolka, Robert Howland, Emad Eskandar, Karleyton C Evans, Darin D Dougherty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients with major depressive disorder are unresponsive to conventional therapies. For these patients, neuromodulation approaches are being investigated.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether epidural cortical stimulation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is safe and efficacious for major depressive disorder through a safety and feasibility study.
METHODS: Twelve patients were recruited in this randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study with a 104-week follow-up period. The main outcome measures were Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-28 (HDRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Global Assessment of Function (GAF), and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction (QLES) questionnaire. An electrode was implanted over Brodmann area 9/46 in the left hemisphere. The electrode provided long-term stimulation to this target via its connections to an implanted neurostimulator in the chest.
RESULTS: During the sham-controlled phase, there was no statistical difference between sham and active stimulation, although a trend toward efficacy was seen with the active stimulation group. In the open-label phase, we observed a significant improvement in outcome scores for the HDRS, MADRS, and GAF but not the QLES (HDRS: df = 7, F = 7.72, P < .001; MADRS: df = 7, F = 8.2, P < .001; GAF: df = 5, F = 16.87, P < .001; QLES: df = 5, F = 1.32, P > .2; repeated measures ANOVA). With regard to the HDRS, 6 patients had ≥ 40% improvement, 5 patients had ≥ 50% improvement, and 4 subjects achieved remission (HDRS < 10) at some point during the study.
CONCLUSION: Epidural cortical stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex appears to be a safe and potentially efficacious neuromodulation approach for treatment-refractory major depressive disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709597     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318229cfcd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  17 in total

1.  The role of electrode location and stimulation polarity in patient response to cortical stimulation for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Yagna Pathak; Brian H Kopell; Aniko Szabo; Charles Rainey; Harold Harsch; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Use of cortical stimulation in neuropathic pain, tinnitus, depression, and movement disorders.

Authors:  Fedor Panov; Brian Harris Kopell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Role of functional imaging in the development and refinement of invasive neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Joseph J Taylor; Kayla Lamb; Colleen A Hanlon; E Baron Short; Mark S George
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 5.  Multimodal approaches to define network oscillations in depression.

Authors:  Otis Lkuwamy Smart; Vineet Ravi Tiruvadi; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: systematic review of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Takashi Morishita; Sarah M Fayad; Masa-aki Higuchi; Kelsey A Nestor; Kelly D Foote
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Identification of reproducible individualized targets for treatment of depression with TMS based on intrinsic connectivity.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Hesheng Liu; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Device-Based Modulation of Neurocircuits as a Therapeutic for Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Bruce Luber; Nicholas L Balderston; Melbaliz Velez Afanador; Michelle M Noh; Jeena Thomas; William C Altekruse; Shannon L Exley; Shriya Awasthi; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 9.  Neurotherapeutic Interventions for Psychiatric Illness.

Authors:  Darin D Dougherty; Alik S Widge
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Comparison of spherical and realistically shaped boundary element head models for transcranial magnetic stimulation navigation.

Authors:  Aapo Nummenmaa; Matti Stenroos; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Yoshio C Okada; Matti S Hämäläinen; Tommi Raij
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.