Literature DB >> 21709146

Enhanced analgesic responses after preferential delivery of morphine and fentanyl to the olfactory epithelium in rats.

John D Hoekman1, Rodney J Y Ho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Centrally acting opioid analgesics such as morphine and fentanyl are effective, but their efficacy is often limited by a delayed response or side effects resulting from systemic first pass before reaching the brain and the central nervous system (CNS). It is generally accepted that drugs applied to the nasal cavity can directly access the brain and the CNS, which could provide therapeutic advantages such as rapid onset and lower systemic exposure. The olfactory region of the nasal cavity has been implicated in facilitating this direct nose-to-CNS transfer. If the fraction of opioid administered to the olfactory region could be improved, there could be a larger fraction of drug directly delivered to the CNS, mediating greater therapeutic benefit.
METHODS: We have developed a pressurized olfactory delivery (POD) device to consistently and noninvasively deposit a majority of drug on the olfactory region of the nasal cavity in Sprague-Dawley rats. Using the tail-flick latency test and analysis of plasma and CNS tissue drug exposure, we compared distribution and efficacy of the opioids morphine and fentanyl administered to the nasal olfactory region with the POD device or the nasal respiratory region with nose drops or systemically via intraperitoneal injection.
RESULTS: Compared with nose drop administration, POD administration of morphine resulted in a significantly higher overall therapeutic effect (area under the curve [over the time course] [AUC](effect)) without a significant increase in plasma drug exposure (AUC(plasma)). POD of morphine resulted in a nose-to-CNS direct transport percentage of 38% to 55%. POD of fentanyl led to a faster (5 vs 10 minutes) and more intense analgesic effect compared with nasal respiratory administration. Unlike intraperitoneal injection or nose drop administration, both morphine and fentanyl given by the POD device to olfactory nasal epithelium exhibited clockwise (plasma) versus effect hysteresis after nasal POD administration, consistent with a direct nose-to-CNS drug transport mechanism.
CONCLUSIONS: Deposition of opioids to the olfactory region within the nasal cavity could have a significant impact on drug distribution and pharmacodynamic effect, and thus should be considered in future nasally administered opioid studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709146      PMCID: PMC3161132          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182239b8c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  29 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling: why?

Authors:  J Pérez-Urizar; V Granados-Soto; F J Flores-Murrieta; G Castañeda-Hernández
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 2.  Assessing and managing opiate-induced constipation in adults with cancer.

Authors:  Susan C McMillan
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 3.  Drug delivery to the nasal cavity: in vitro and in vivo assessment.

Authors:  Stephen P Newman; Gary R Pitcairn; Richard N Dalby
Journal:  Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.889

4.  Comparative morphometry of the nasal cavity in rats and mice.

Authors:  E A Gross; J A Swenberg; S Fields; J A Popp
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Recent development in therapeutics for breakthrough pain.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.618

6.  Preparation of nimodipine-loaded microemulsion for intranasal delivery and evaluation on the targeting efficiency to the brain.

Authors:  Qizhi Zhang; Xinguo Jiang; Wenming Jiang; Wei Lu; Lina Su; Zhenqi Shi
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 7.  Nasal administration of opioids for pain management in adults.

Authors:  O Dale; R Hjortkjaer; E D Kharasch
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Uptake of estradiol or progesterone into the CSF following intranasal and intravenous delivery in rats.

Authors:  Mascha P van den Berg; J Coos Verhoef; Stefan G Romeijn; Frans W H M Merkus
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.571

9.  A microdialysis model to examine nasal drug delivery and olfactory absorption in rats using lidocaine hydrochloride as a model drug.

Authors:  Morten Bagger; Erik Bechgaard
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 10.  Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: pathophysiology and potential new therapies.

Authors:  Andrea Kurz; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The promise and pitfalls of intranasally administering psychopharmacological agents for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  D S Quintana; A J Guastella; L T Westlye; O A Andreassen
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  First Steps to Develop and Validate a CFPD Model in Order to Support the Design of Nose-to-Brain Delivered Biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Lucas Engelhardt; Martina Röhm; Chrystelle Mavoungou; Katharina Schindowski; Annette Schafmeister; Ulrich Simon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Intranasal delivery of a peptide with antidepressant-like effect.

Authors:  Virginia Brown; Fang Liu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Christopher Louizos; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Visualization and Quantification of Nasal and Olfactory Deposition in a Sectional Adult Nasal Airway Cast.

Authors:  Jinxiang Xi; Jiayao Eddie Yuan; Yu Zhang; Dannielle Nevorski; Zhaoxuan Wang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Aerosol-stable peptide-coated liposome nanoparticles: a proof-of-concept study with opioid fentanyl in enhancing analgesic effects and reducing plasma drug exposure.

Authors:  John D Hoekman; Pramod Srivastava; Rodney J Y Ho
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Intranasal Oxytocin and Vasopressin Modulate Divergent Brainwide Functional Substrates.

Authors:  Alberto Galbusera; Alessia De Felice; Stefano Girardi; Giacomo Bassetto; Marta Maschietto; Katsuhiko Nishimori; Bice Chini; Francesco Papaleo; Stefano Vassanelli; Alessandro Gozzi
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  An observational feasibility study to assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasal fentanyl for radiofrequency ablations of the lumbar facet joints.

Authors:  Michael W Bartoszek; Amy McCoart; Kyung-Soo Jason Hong; Chelsey Haley; Krista Beth Highland; Anthony R Plunkett
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective-a review.

Authors:  Per Gisle Djupesland
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.617

10.  STOP 301: A Phase 3, open-label study of safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of INP104, Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD® ) of dihydroergotamine mesylate, over 24/52 weeks in acute treatment of migraine attacks in adult patients.

Authors:  Timothy R Smith; Paul Winner; Sheena K Aurora; Maria Jeleva; Jasna Hocevar-Trnka; Stephen B Shrewsbury
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 5.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.