Literature DB >> 21709142

Overview of screening: where we are and where we may be headed.

Russell Harris1.   

Abstract

This volume of Epidemiologic Reviews continues a discussion about screening within the evidence community that has been going on for many years. From various perspectives, the authors of these reviews consider the benefits and harms of screening for multiple conditions; the balance between benefits and harms (and costs) is often not clear. With few exceptions, the contribution of screening to improving the health of the public is small, yet it has become a popular and growing form of prevention. It may be that we are learning that the magnitude of benefit from screening is less than we hoped, and the harms may be greater than we thought. Perhaps we should not think of screening as our primary prevention strategy but rather use screening to make a real, but limited contribution to population health for a few conditions. We might target screening to smaller subpopulations with the highest potential benefit and the lowest potential harm. The payoff for population health could be greater if we shifted some resources we now devote to screening to developing, testing, and implementing alternative approaches to preventing the important threats to population health. There needs to be a wider discussion about these issues with the public.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709142     DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Rev        ISSN: 0193-936X            Impact factor:   6.222


  11 in total

1.  A population approach to precision medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta L Gwinn; Russell E Glasgow; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  The psychological harms of screening: the evidence we have versus the evidence we need.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Colleen Barclay; Stacey Sheridan; Noel T Brewer; Meredith Gilliam; Andrew M Moon; William Rearick; Carolyn Ziemer; Russell Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Cancer screening: the journey from epidemiology to policy.

Authors:  Stephen A Deppen; Melinda C Aldrich; Patricia Hartge; Christine D Berg; Graham A Colditz; Diana B Petitti; Robert A Hiatt
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Non-normal Screening Mammography Results, Lumpectomies, and Breast Cancer Reported by California Women, 2001-2009.

Authors:  Veronica L Irvin; Nancy Breen; Helen I Meissner; Benmei Liu; Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 5.  Challenges in Metabolomics-Based Tests, Biomarkers Revealed by Metabolomic Analysis, and the Promise of the Application of Metabolomics in Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Minno; Monica Gelzo; Marianna Caterino; Michele Costanzo; Margherita Ruoppolo; Giuseppe Castaldo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Robin Bennett; Jeffrey Botkin; Ellen Wright Clayton; Gail E Henderson; Ingrid A Holm; Gail P Jarvik; Muin J Khoury; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Mark A Rothstein; Howard Saal; Wendy R Uhlmann; Benjamin Wilfond; Susan M Wolf; Ron Zimmern
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases?

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; A Cecile J W Janssens; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Metabolomics for the masses: The future of metabolomics in a personalized world.

Authors:  Drupad K Trivedi; Katherine A Hollywood; Royston Goodacre
Journal:  New Horiz Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

9.  Practice guideline: joint CCMG-SOGC recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal loss in Canada.

Authors:  Christine M Armour; Shelley Danielle Dougan; Jo-Ann Brock; Radha Chari; Bernie N Chodirker; Isabelle DeBie; Jane A Evans; William T Gibson; Elena Kolomietz; Tanya N Nelson; Frédérique Tihy; Mary Ann Thomas; Dimitri J Stavropoulos
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Screening for Developmental Disorders in 3- and 4-Year-Old Italian Children: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Elena Catino; Michela Di Trani; Federica Giovannone; Filippo Manti; Letizia Nunziata; Francesca Piccari; Virginia Sirchia; Lucia Vannucci; Carla Sogos
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.