Literature DB >> 21709026

Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement in athletes.

J W Thomas Byrd1, Kay S Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip pathology is a significant source of pain and dysfunction among athletic individuals and femoroacetabular impingement is often a causative factor. Arthroscopic intervention has been proposed to address the joint damage and underlying impingement. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopy may be effective in the management of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement in athletes. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series, Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: All patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at 1 institution were prospectively assessed with a modified Harris hip score obtained preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 120 months. This report consists of a cohort of 200 patients identified who underwent arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement, participated in athletic activities, and had achieved minimum 1-year follow up.
RESULTS: There was 100% follow-up at an average of 19 months (range, 12-60 months). A total of 116 athletes had achieved 2-year follow-up. For the entire cohort, the average age was 28.6 years (range, 11-60 years) with 148 males and 52 females. There were 159 cam, 31 combined, and 10 pincer lesions. There were 23 professional, 56 intercollegiate, 24 high school, and 97 recreational athletes. The male:female ratio was 2.8:1 among cam lesions and 1:1 among pincer lesions. The median preoperative score was 72 with a postoperative score of 96 and the median improvement was 20.5 points, which was statistically significant (P < .001). Ninety-five percent of professional athletes and 85% of intercollegiate athletes were able to return to their previous level of competition. There were 5 transient neurapraxias (all resolved) and 1 minor heterotopic ossification. One athlete (0.5%) underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty and 4 (2%) underwent repeat arthroscopy. For the group with minimum 2-year follow up, the median improvement was 21 points with a postoperative score of 96.
CONCLUSION: The data substantiate successful outcomes in the arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement with few complications and most athletes were able to resume activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709026     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511404144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  61 in total

1.  Treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Gennaro Fiorentino; Alberto Fontanarosa; Riccardo Cepparulo; Alberto Guardoli; Luca Berni; Gianluca Coviello; Aldo Guardoli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 2.  MRI of the hip for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement; past, present, and future.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Riley; Emily J McWalter; Kathryn J Stevens; Marc R Safran; Riccardo Lattanzi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Ultrasonography can quantify the extent of osteochondroplasty after treatment of Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Solveig Lerch; Andreas Kasperczyk; Thomas Berndt; Oliver Rühmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Improved arthroscopic visualization of peripheral compartment.

Authors:  Adam G Suslak; Richard C Mather; Bryan T Kelly; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-04-13

5.  Arthroscopic technique for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Timothy J Jackson; Christine E Stake; Anthony P Trenga; Julie Morgan; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-02-16

6.  PRE- AND POST-OPERATIVE SELF-REPORTED FUNCTION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT GENERALIZED JOINT LAXITY UNDERGOING HIP ARTHROSCOPY FOR FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT.

Authors:  Mattie Pontiff; Matthew P Ithurburn; Thomas Ellis; Kathleen Cenkus; Stephanie Di Stasi
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

7.  CORR Insights®: What Factors Predict Conversion to THA After Arthroscopy?

Authors:  Brian T Barlow
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kowalczuk; M Bhandari; F Farrokhyar; I Wong; M Chahal; S Neely; R Gandhi; O R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Assessing long-term return to play after hip arthroscopy in football players evaluating risk factors for good prognosis.

Authors:  D Barastegui; R Seijas; P Alvarez-Diaz; E Rivera; E Alentorn-Geli; G Steinbacher; X Cuscó; R Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Do professional athletes perform better than recreational athletes after arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; Christos P Paliobeis; Richard N Villar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.