| Literature DB >> 21708868 |
Tessa Sanderson1, Sarah Hewlett, Pam Richards, Marianne Morris, Michael Calnan.
Abstract
The nominal group technique generates quantitative data through a process of experts ranking items of interest. This article focuses on the additional collection of qualitative data from nominal groups with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, used to explore the influences on prioritizing treatment outcomes. Across all groups, the top five outcomes with the highest importance scores were identified as: pain; joint damage; fatigue; activities of daily living; and mobility. Qualitative findings showed that the personal impact of RA influenced decisions on how to rank specific outcomes through four domains: disease impact; adaptation to illness; external resources and stressors; and social expectations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21708868 DOI: 10.1177/1359105311410758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Psychol ISSN: 1359-1053