Literature DB >> 21708764

Unsegmented annelids? Possible origins of four lophotrochozoan worm taxa.

Kenneth M Halanych1, Thomas G Dahlgren, Damhnait McHugh.   

Abstract

In traditional classification schemes, the Annelida consists of the Polychaeta and the Clitellata (the latter including the Oligochaeta and Hirudinida). However, recent analyses suggest that annelids are much more diverse than traditionally believed, and that polychaetes are paraphyletic. Specifically, some lesser-known taxa (previously regarded as separate phyla) appear to fall within the annelid radiation. Abundant molecular, developmental, and morphological data show that the Siboglinidae, which includes the formerly recognized Pogonophora and Vestimentifera, are derived annelids; recent data from the Elongation Factor-1α (EF-1α) gene also suggest that echiurids are of annelid ancestry. Further, the phylogenetic origins of two other lesser-known groups of marine worms, the Myzostomida and Sipuncula, have recently been called into question. Whereas some authors advocate annelid affinities, others argue that these taxa do not fall within the annelid radiation. With advances in our understanding of annelid phylogeny, our perceptions of body plan evolution within the Metazoa are changing. The evolution of segmentation probably is more plastic than traditionally believed. However, as our understanding of organismal evolution is being revised, we are also forced to reconsider the specific characters being examined. Should segmentation be considered a developmental process or an ontological endpoint?

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 21708764     DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.3.678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  6 in total

1.  MicroRNAs resolve an apparent conflict between annelid systematics and their fossil record.

Authors:  Erik A Sperling; Jakob Vinther; Vanessa N Moy; Benjamin M Wheeler; Marie Sémon; Derek E G Briggs; Kevin J Peterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sipunculans and segmentation.

Authors:  Andreas Wanninger; Alen Kristof; Nora Brinkmann
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

Review 3.  New perspectives on the ecology and evolution of siboglinid tubeworms.

Authors:  Ana Hilário; María Capa; Thomas G Dahlgren; Kenneth M Halanych; Crispin T S Little; Daniel J Thornhill; Caroline Verna; Adrian G Glover
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spiral cleavage and early embryology of a loxosomatid entoproct and the usefulness of spiralian apical cross patterns for phylogenetic inferences.

Authors:  Julia Merkel; Tim Wollesen; Bernhard Lieb; Andreas Wanninger
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  The impact of fossil data on annelid phylogeny inferred from discrete morphological characters.

Authors:  Luke A Parry; Gregory D Edgecombe; Danny Eibye-Jacobsen; Jakob Vinther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura.

Authors:  Torsten H Struck; Nancy Schult; Tiffany Kusen; Emily Hickman; Christoph Bleidorn; Damhnait McHugh; Kenneth M Halanych
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.