Literature DB >> 21708692

Assessing immunological function in toxicological studies of avian wildlife.

Keith A Grasman1.   

Abstract

Laboratory and field studies have demonstrated that the immune system is sensitive to environmental contaminants. Testing protocols have been developed to screen for immunotoxic effects and elucidate mechanisms of toxicity in laboratory rodents. Similar methods have been applied to wildlife species in captivity and the wild. Several epizootics in wildlife have been associated with elevated exposure to contaminants. This paper discusses immunotoxicological techniques used in studies of avian wildlife. Measurements of immunological structure include peripheral white blood cell counts and the mass and cellularity of immune organs such as the thymus, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius. While contaminants can alter these measures of immunological structure, such measures do not directly assess how the immune system functions, i.e., responds to specific challenges. The two most commonly used in vivo immune function tests in birds are the phytohemagglutinin (PHA) skin response for T cell-mediated immunity and the sheep red blood cell (SRBC) hemagglutination assay for antibody-mediated immunity. In vitro tests of immune function in avian wildlife include proliferation of lymphocytes in response to various mitogens and phagocytosis of fluorescent particles by monocytes. While optimization of in vitro techniques for wildlife species is often time-consuming, these assays usually require only a single blood sample and can elucidate mechanisms of toxicity. In immunological studies of wildlife, investigators should consider factors that may influence immune responses, including age, body condition, date, developmental stage of the immune system, and time required for the progression of immune responses.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 21708692     DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.1.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  17 in total

1.  Responding to inflammatory challenges is less costly for a successful avian invader, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus), than its less-invasive congener.

Authors:  Kelly A Lee; Lynn B Martin; Martin C Wikelski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Lead exposure affects health indices in free-ranging ducks in Argentina.

Authors:  Hebe Ferreyra; Pablo M Beldomenico; Krysten Marchese; Marcelo Romano; Andrea Caselli; Ana I Correa; Marcela Uhart
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Evaluation of neurobehavioral abnormalities and immunotoxicity in response to oral imidacloprid exposure in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Dana Franzen-Klein; Mark Jankowski; Charlotte L Roy; Hoa Nguyen-Phuc; Da Chen; Lorin Neuman-Lee; Patrick Redig; Julia Ponder
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Effects of selenium exposure on the hematology, innate immunity, and metabolic rate of yellow-bellied sliders (Trachemys scripta scripta).

Authors:  David L Haskins; Matthew T Hamilton; Nicole I Stacy; John W Finger; Tracey D Tuberville
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations.

Authors:  John C Korsman; Aafke M Schipper; H J Rob Lenders; Ruud P B Foppen; A Jan Hendriks
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Metal accumulation and evaluation of effects in a freshwater turtle.

Authors:  Shuangying Yu; Richard S Halbrook; Donald W Sparling; Robert Colombo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Disentangling interactions among mercury, immunity and infection in a Neotropical bat community.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Kelly A Speer; Jennifer M Korstian; Dmitriy V Volokhov; Hannah F Droke; Alexis M Brown; Catherene L Baijnauth; Ticha Padgett-Stewart; Hugh G Broders; Raina K Plowright; Thomas R Rainwater; M Brock Fenton; Nancy B Simmons; Matthew M Chumchal
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.528

8.  Lead toxicosis of captive vultures: case description and responses to chelation therapy.

Authors:  Jiri Pikula; Pavlina Hajkova; Hana Bandouchova; Ivana Bednarova; Vojtech Adam; Miroslava Beklova; Jiri Kral; Karel Ondracek; Jitka Osickova; Miroslav Pohanka; Jana Sedlackova; Hana Skochova; Jakub Sobotka; Frantisek Treml; Rene Kizek
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  T-cell responses in oiled guillemots and swans in a rehabilitation setting.

Authors:  Gera M Troisi
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Defects in host immune function in tree frogs with chronic chytridiomycosis.

Authors:  Sam Young; Paul Whitehorn; Lee Berger; Lee F Skerratt; Rick Speare; Stephen Garland; Rebecca Webb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.