| Literature DB >> 21708511 |
Sandrah P Eckel1, Kiros Berhane, Muhammad T Salam, Edward B Rappaport, William S Linn, Theresa M Bastain, Yue Zhang, Frederick Lurmann, Edward L Avol, Frank D Gilliland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The fractional concentration of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FeNO) potentially detects airway inflammation related to air pollution exposure. Existing studies have not yet provided conclusive evidence on the association of FeNO with traffic-related pollution (TRP).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21708511 PMCID: PMC3230449 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Demographic characteristics and potentialconfounders by parent report of doctor-diagnosed asthma.
| Without asthma ( | With asthma ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Mean ± SD or % | Mean ± SD or % | ||
| FeNO (ppb) | 13.1 (1.8) | 16.2 (2.1) | ||
| Age (years) | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 9.3 ± 0.6 | ||
| Percent male | 47.1 | 55.5 | ||
| Body mass index percentile | 66.0 ± 29.2 | 69.7 ± 28.7 | ||
| Percent missing | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||
| Race/ethnicity (%) | ||||
| White/non-Hispanic | 33.7 | 32.1 | ||
| Hispanic | 56.8 | 55.0 | ||
| Black | 1.8 | 2.9 | ||
| Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 3.1 | 3.3 | ||
| Other | 4.6 | 6.7 | ||
| Missing | 0.1 | 0.0 | ||
| Parent education (%) | ||||
| < 12th grade | 20.4 | 15.3 | ||
| Completed 12th grade | 17.1 | 16.7 | ||
| > 12th grade | 58.0 | 64.6 | ||
| Missing | 4.5 | 3.3 | ||
| Respiratory allergy (%) | ||||
| Never | 47.6 | 17.7 | ||
| No current | 28.3 | 29.7 | ||
| Current | 24.0 | 52.6 | ||
| Missing | 0.1 | 0.0 | ||
| Asthma medication (%) | ||||
| None | 97.4 | 62.7 | ||
| Rescue only | 2.2 | 28.2 | ||
| Control only | 0.2 | 3.3 | ||
| Rescue and control | 0.2 | 5.7 | ||
| Exposed to secondhand smoke (%) | 5.1 | 3.8 | ||
| Missing | 0.6 | 1.4 | ||
| Time of FeNO collection [hours (%)] | ||||
| 0800–0859 | 6.3 | 5.3 | ||
| 0900–1159 | 85.7 | 81.8 | ||
| 1200–1359 | 7.4 | 12.0 | ||
| 1400–1559 | 0.7 | 1.0 | ||
| Percent outdoor test | 3.2 | 2.4 | ||
Distribution summaries for the TRP exposure metrics.
| Percentile | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Mean ± SD | Min | 5th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 95th | Max | |||||||||
| Distance: freeway (m) | 1469.7 ± | 1200.5 | 23.8 | 131.6 | 483.9 | 1167.2 | 2191.4 | 3723.0 | 8567.4 | ||||||||
| Distance: major road (m) | 462.1 ± | 533.1 | 3.0 | 7.8 | 140.0 | 294.1 | 585.9 | 1541.0 | 5642.3 | ||||||||
| Length all roads: 50-m buffer (m) | 126.8 ± | 48.7 | 0.0 | 75.3 | 99.3 | 106.5 | 153.6 | 204.8 | 408.0 | ||||||||
| Length local roads: 50-m buffer (m) | 114.4 ± | 47.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 98.2 | 99.9 | 145.1 | 190.9 | 302.4 | ||||||||
| Length all roads: 100-m buffer (m) | 406.4 ± | 162.0 | 0.0 | 196.8 | 299.6 | 393.5 | 507.3 | 688.0 | 1072.0 | ||||||||
| Length local roads: 100-m buffer (m) | 356.8 ± | 153.3 | 0.0 | 120.4 | 247.7 | 356.2 | 460.9 | 607.9 | 971.7 | ||||||||
| Length all roads: 200-m buffer (m) | 1552.0 ± | 565.7 | 0.0 | 572.7 | 1175.2 | 1582.2 | 1928.0 | 2454.1 | 3311.0 | ||||||||
| Length local roads: 200-m buffer (m) | 1313.9 ± | 511.8 | 0.0 | 421.5 | 971.5 | 1356.5 | 1682.4 | 2086.0 | 3090.7 | ||||||||
| Density: 150-m buffer (vehicles/day) | 9199.1 ± | 19562.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2285.5 | 10429.3 | 34902.3 | 195515.8 | ||||||||
| Density: 300-m buffer (vehicles/day) | 16435.5 ± | 28963.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 870.7 | 6348.1 | 18716.4 | 71089.3 | 224321.4 | ||||||||
| CALINE4 NOx: freeway (ppb) | 13.3 ± | 15.4 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 9.0 | 17.8 | 38.9 | 197.0 | ||||||||
| CALINE4 NOx: nonfreeway (ppb) | 6.7 ± | 5.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 9.3 | 16.9 | 49.8 | ||||||||
| Predicted NO (intracommunity) | 17.9 ± | 14.4 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 7.2 | 13.3 | 23.8 | 47.9 | 78.3 | ||||||||
| Predicted NO2 (intracommunity) | 19.4 ± | 8.8 | 2.9 | 4.9 | 11.1 | 20.7 | 26.7 | 31.6 | 41.4 | ||||||||
| Predicted NOx (intracommunity) | 37.4 ± | 21.8 | 4.0 | 8.4 | 19.2 | 34.0 | 51.6 | 77.3 | 109.0 | ||||||||
| Abbreviations: Max, maximum; Min, minimum. | |||||||||||||||||
Figure 1Estimated percent difference in FeNO and 95% CI associated with an increase in each length of road metric: (A) adjusting for asthma status and (B) fitting separate models by asthma status. Adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, asthma status (A), asthma medication, rhinitis history, age at collection, BMI percentile, secondhand tobacco smoke, parental education, month and hour of FeNO collection, outdoor testing, and community of residence. Exposure contrasts: 100 m, 300 m, and 1,000 m for length of roads in a 50-m, 100-m, and 200-m buffer, respectively.
Within-community correlations of the TRP exposure metrics.
| Distance | Length: 50 m | Length: 100 m | Length: 200 m | Density | CALINE4 | Predicted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Fwy | M road | All | Local | All | Local | All | Local | 150 m | 300 m | Fwy | Nonfwy | NO | NO2 | NOx | |||||||||||||||
| Distance: freeway | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distance: major road | 0.42 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Length all roads: 50-m buffer | –0.11 | –0.14 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Length local roads: 50-m buffer | –0.04 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Length all roads: 100-m buffer | –0.17 | –0.20 | 0.62 | 0.40 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Length local roads: 100-m buffer | –0.06 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Length all roads: 200-m buffer | –0.26 | –0.30 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Length local roads: 200-m buffer | –0.08 | –0.01 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Density: 150-m buffer | –0.22 | –0.14 | 0.15 | –0.07 | 0.29 | –0.08 | 0.31 | –0.09 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Density: 300-m buffer | –0.30 | –0.16 | 0.11 | –0.02 | 0.23 | –0.05 | 0.35 | –0.09 | 0.90 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CALINE4 NOx: freeway | –0.48 | –0.15 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.22 | –0.01 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CALINE4 NOx: nonfreeway | –0.10 | –0.25 | 0.38 | –0.17 | 0.25 | –0.15 | 0.22 | –0.07 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Predicted NO | –0.44 | –0.31 | 0.29 | –0.10 | 0.26 | –0.08 | 0.32 | –0.04 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||
| Predicted NO2 | –0.50 | –0.41 | 0.26 | –0.05 | 0.25 | –0.03 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
| Predicted NOx | –0.49 | –0.37 | 0.27 | –0.07 | 0.25 | –0.05 | 0.34 | –0.01 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
Estimated percent difference in FeNOa associated with an increaseb in each TRP exposure metric.
| Exposure | Percent difference (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance: freeway | –0.15 | (–1.48 to 1.21) | 0.83 | ||
| Distance: major road | –0.72 | (–1.82 to 0.39) | 0.20 | ||
| Length all roads: 50-m buffer | 2.84 | (–2.45 to 8.42) | 0.30 | ||
| Length local roads: 50-m buffer | 4.75 | (–0.68 to 10.49) | 0.09 | ||
| Length all roads: 100-m buffer | 5.07 | (0.03 to 10.37) | 0.05 | ||
| Length local roads: 100-m buffer | 6.02 | (0.72 to 11.60) | 0.03 | ||
| Length all roads: 200-m buffer | 4.80 | (–0.42 to 10.29) | 0.07 | ||
| Length local roads: 200-m buffer | 6.84 | (1.10 to 12.90) | 0.02 | ||
| Density: 150-m buffer | 0.36 | (–1.00 to 1.73) | 0.61 | ||
| Density: 300-m buffer | 0.06 | (–0.88 to 1.01) | 0.90 | ||
| CALINE4 NOx: freeway | –0.32 | (–1.38 to 0.76) | 0.56 | ||
| CALINE4 NOx: nonfreeway | –0.63 | (–3.39 to 2.21) | 0.66 | ||
| Predicted NO | –2.59 | (–6.88 to 1.90) | 0.25 | ||
| Predicted NO2 | –1.17 | (–8.60 to 6.87) | 0.77 | ||
| Predicted NOx | –1.08 | (–3.98 to 1.90) | 0.48 | ||
Figure 2Smooth association of length of local roads in a 50-m buffer with FeNO for children with asthma (black solid line: smooth fitted value for a child with average values for the adjustment covariates; black dashed line is the 95% CI). The estimated degrees of freedom (EDF) and the p-value testing the association of the smooth with FeNO are displayed. On the y-axis, values are plotted on the natural log scale and labeled on the original scale. Adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, asthma medication, rhinitis history, age at collection, BMI percentile, secondhand tobacco smoke, parental education, month and hour of FeNO collection, outdoor testing, and community of residence.