Literature DB >> 21708243

Porcine Corneal Ocular Reversibility Assay (PorCORA) predicts ocular damage and recovery for global regulatory agency hazard categories.

Michelle Piehl1, Micheal Carathers, Rachel Soda, Daniel Cerven, George DeGeorge.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the capacity of the Porcine Corneal Ocular Reversibility Assay (PorCORA) to classify the reversibility of ocular effects for 32 test compounds (20 reversible, 12 irreversible) from various chemical classes. PorCORA predicted 28 of 32 compounds correctly when compared to historical rabbit eye test data. The correlation coefficient for PorCORA versus historical rabbit test data was 0.84, based on the last day of damaged cornea reversal. These results demonstrate a high correlation between corneal irritation recovery time in the PorCORA and the rabbit eye. When compared to historical Modified Maximal Average Score (MMAS) in rabbit eyes, PorCORA yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.80, demonstrating ability to predict MMAS. PorCORA was highly predictive of regulatory agency ocular hazard classification categories, resulting in 91% accuracy for EU R41 and GHS Category 1. PorCORA was also predictive of EPA Category I (88% accuracy). Overall, the accuracy (88-91%), sensitivity (79-86%), specificity (94%), positive predictivity (94%), and negative predictivity (85-89%) for all three regulatory classifications indicate that ocular irritation hazardous effects were well predicted by the PorCORA. This study suggests that PorCORA could help discriminate between EU R36 and R41, GHS Categories 1 and 2, and EPA Categories I and II.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21708243     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  4 in total

Review 1.  In vitro reconstructed 3D corneal tissue models for ocular toxicology and ophthalmic drug development.

Authors:  Yulia Kaluzhny; Mitchell Klausner
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).

Authors:  João Barroso; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Els Adriaens; Nathalie Alépée; Magalie Cluzel; Ann De Smedt; Jalila Hibatallah; Martina Klaric; Karsten R Mewes; Marion Millet; Marie Templier; Pauline McNamee
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods.

Authors:  Els Adriaens; João Barroso; Chantra Eskes; Sebastian Hoffmann; Pauline McNamee; Nathalie Alépée; Sandrine Bessou-Touya; Ann De Smedt; Bart De Wever; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Magalie Tailhardat; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Replacing the Draize eye test: Impedance spectroscopy as a 3R method to discriminate between all GHS categories for eye irritation.

Authors:  C Lotz; L Kiesewetter; F F Schmid; J Hansmann; H Walles; F Groeber-Becker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.