Literature DB >> 21708016

Should chronic hepatitis B mothers breastfeed? a meta analysis.

Yingjie Zheng1, Yihan Lu, Qi Ye, Yugang Xia, Yueqin Zhou, Qingqing Yao, Shan Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) exists in the breast milk of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) mothers. The authors use a meta-analytic technique to quantify the evidence of an association between breastfeeding and risk of CHB infection among the infants vaccinated against HBV.
METHODS: Literature search is performed up to 2010 on the relationship between infantile CHB infection within one-year follow up after immunization with the third-dose hepatitis B vaccine and breastfeeding. Two reviewers independently extract the data and evaluate the methodological quality. A random-effects model is employed to systematically combine the results of all included studies.
RESULTS: Based on data from 32 studies, 4.32% (244/5650) of infants born of CHB mothers develop CHB infection. The difference in risk of the infection between breastfed and formula-fed infants (RD) is -0.8%, (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.6%, 0.1%). Analysis of the data from 16 of the studies finds that RD for mothers who are positive for the HBeAg and/or the HBV DNA, 0.7% (95%CI: -2.0%, 3.5%), is similar to that for those who are negative for these infectivity markers, -0.5% (95%CI: -1.7%, 0.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast milk is infectious; yet, breastfeeding, even by mothers with high infectivity, is not associated with demonstrable risk of infantile CHB infection, provided that the infants have been vaccinated against HBV at birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21708016      PMCID: PMC3141463          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


Background

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) accounts for a significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. An estimated one-third of the world population has been exposed to HBV and 400 million people are chronic carriers [1]. Mother to infant transmission of HBV would occur among up to 90% of infants born of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) mothers who are positive for the infectivity markers, the HBeAg and/or the HBV DNA [2]. With the introduction of a safe and effective hepatitis B vaccine, infantile CHB infection has dramatically dropped to around 5% [3]. The advantages of breastfeeding over formula feeding have been well documented [4]. However, the presence of the HBV in breast milk firstly reported by Linnemann [5] in 1974 and confirmed by later studies [6,7] raised the possibility of transmission of HBV through breastfeeding. But later studies found no association between breastfeeding and infantile CHB infection, both before and after the introduction of hepatitis B vaccine [8-13]. In the absence of evidence that breastfeeding poses any additional risk of infection to infants born of CHB mothers, World Health Organization (WHO) recommends breastfeeding even for area where HBV infection is highly endemic and HBV vaccine is not available [14]. Scepticism about this recommendation remains among clinicians, however. About 25% of obstetricians in Australia [15] and 50% of physicians (most of them were hepatologists!) in Illinois [16] did not recommend CHB mothers to breastfeed their babies. It was noted that 5.4% of pregnant women in Shanghai were HBsAg positive and 30.3% of whom were HBeAg-positive (Tao, personal communication), which was reported to pose a significant risk of HBV transmission to infants, including those who had been vaccinated against the virus [17]. In the light of this and other studies [10], it is a common and recommended practice that CHB mothers with an abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level before delivery do not breastfeed. In the present paper, we conduct a meta analysis to assess the risk of CHB infection of vaccinated infants through breastfeeding associating with CHB mothers who are and are not positive for the HBV infectivity markers.

Methods

Data sources and search strategy

Two independent investigators (Ye and Zhou) searched PubMed (1966-), Chinese BioMedical Literature database (CBM, 1978-), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1979-) and Wanfang Data (Wanfang, 1998-) up to December 31th, 2010 by using the combination of MeSH terms "breast feeding" or "breastfeeding" and "hepatitis B". In addition, the reference lists of potentially relevant manuscripts were scanned backward to obtain extra eligible studies.

Criteria for inclusion of the studies

(1) Follow-up studies, prospective or retrospective, on the association between breastfeeding (BF) versus formula-feeding (FF) and risk of CHB infection among the infants born of CHB mothers. (2) All infants must receive at least 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccines, with or without receiving hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) after birth. (3) CHB infection is defined as the presence of any of the three HBV markers (HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA) in blood, during prenatal care visit and/or before delivery of their babies for the mothers and within one year after immunization with the third-dose hepatitis B vaccine for the infants.

Data extraction

Two independent investigators (Xia and Yao) were involved in data extraction. The third investigator (Lu) examined the results, and a consensus was reached. The outcome, CHB infection of the infants born of CHB mothers at the end of follow-up within one year after immunization with the third-dose hepatitis B vaccine was considered. We extracted the following data from the eligible studies: authors' names, journal and year of publication, country of origin, enrolment periods, type of study, number of CHB and non-CHB among the infants by feeding methods, general characteristics of the babies and their mothers.

Assessment of methodological quality

Two independent investigators (Yao and Wei) evaluated the quality of each study based on Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) [18]. The third investigator (Zheng) examined the results, and a consensus was reached (Table 1). We did not consider the 4th item under selection (Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study) and the 2nd item under outcome (Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur) in NOS, for the reason that the outcomes were available at the end of the follow-up period which was pre-defined in our criteria of inclusion. And we defined the studies with NOS ≥ 5 as with high quality and the others with NOS < 5 as with low quality.
Table 1

General characteristic and quality score of the 32 studies included in this meta analysis

NoAuthor, publication year and NOSMothers enrolled period and sitesNumber of infants, length of follow up and types of studyCharacteristic of the mothers*1Mothers' Infectivity%Characteristic of the babiesInfantile vaccination*2DBF(m)Other characteristics
1.De Martino[11]19853NAItaly85 cases12 monthsProspectiveAPCW, S+ and C+; a normal pregnancy; informed consent.2.3(E)Normal ALT and birth weight.0.5 ml/kg HBIG/8 h + 1 ml(P)/2-4-11 mSex ratio of 1.2, no medication except a multivitamin mixture, vaccination against polio, tetanus and diphtheria; monthly visit, no dropout; no vaccine-related serious side effect and no abnormal ALT was observed at the end of follow up.Mothers' E+% and newborns' gender were similar between BF and FF.
2.Tseng [12]19883NAHongkong, China170 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.64(E) among BF0.5 ml HBIG/24 h + 5 μg (P)/0-1-6 m
3.Huang [22]19933Aug. 1989-Sept. 1990Guangdong, China112 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.44.8(E)S+% = 6.4 and E+% = 25.6 (U) at birth.30 μg(P)/0-1-6 m9-12Average age of the mothers was 26.97 ± 2.83 years old.
4.Wu [23]199631992-1993Nanjing, China80 cases6 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.55.6(E) among BFFull-term normal delivery.200IU HBIG/4 h,1 m +30 μg(P)/1-3-6 m.12Mothers' age were similar between BF and FF.
5.Zeng [24]20014Jan. 1996-Jun. 1999Guangdong, China190 cases9 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+; normal ALT.29.5(E)S+% = 14.9(U, 134cases) at birth.10 μg (R)/0-1-6 mMothers' E+% was higher in FF than BF.
6.Wu [25]20023Jan. 1995-Dec. 2000Nanjing, China300 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+; normal hepatic function; no nipple crack; 200IU-HBIG treatment.100 (E)Complete gestation birth; no oral ulcer.200IU HBIG/4 h,1 m+10 μg (R)/1-3-6 m with booster.11Mothers' age range was 25-31 years.
7.Hill [10]20026Jan. 1992-Sept. 1998Texas, The United States369 cases9-15 monthsProspectivePCW, S+, CG+ and CM-24.5(E, 179 cases)0.5 ml HBIG+ 0-1-6 mwith booster.4.9Complete follow-up and vaccination; mothers' nulliparous% (all cases), AST/ALT level, anti-HCV+%, HIV-1+%, E+%, CG+% and CM+% based on available cases, and newborns' gender were similar between BF and FF.Mothers were younger and with more blacks in FF than BF.
8.Wang [13]200351994-1999Shanghai, China230 cases12 monthsRetrospectiveAPCW, S+; normal ALT.34(E)37-42 gestation weeks; S+% = 10.9 at birth.30 μg(P, before 1997) or 5 μg(R, after 1997)/0-1-6 m or/24 h+1-2-7 m≥ 2Those infants were excluded with an obvious abnormality, birth weight < 2500 g, or an apgar score of < 8 at 1 or 5 minutes.Mothers' E+%, newborns' gender, birth weight and S+% at birth were similar between BF and FF.BF group received more active immunization than FF.
9.Zeng [26]20032May 1995-Sept. 1997Sichuang, China53 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.100(E or DNA)S-at birth.200IU HBIG/24 h+30 μg(P)/2 w,10 μg/1.5 m, 10 μg/6.5 m≥ 4Duration of breastfeeding < 4 months was excluded.
10.Gu [27]200331998-1999Nanjing, China152 cases12 monthsProspectivePCW, S+ and c+; 200~400IU-HBIG treatment0(E)Healthy; complete gestation weeks; birth weight > 3000 g; S+% = 7.6 at birth.10 μg(R, 80 cases) or 30 μg (P, 72 cases)/24 h-1-6 mProportion of types of vaccines was similar between BF and FF.
11.He [28]20043Dec. 1997-Dec. 1999Inner Mongolia, China38 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.100(DNA)DNA+% = 56(U)100-200IU HBIG/6 h, 2 w+ 0-1-6 m
12.Liu [29]20043Feb. 1998-Feb. 2001Henan, China436 cases12 monthsRetrospectiveAPCW, S+; 200IU-HBIG treatment.S+% = 8.7 and E+% = 0.9 at birth200IU HBIG/24 h, 2 w+5 μg(R)/0-1-6 mNewborns' S+% and E+% at birth were similar between BF and FF.
13.Yao [30]20044Dec. 2000-Jun. 2002Zhejiang, China190 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+; 200IU-HBIG treatment.72.9(E)Healthy; complete gestation weeks; DNA+% = 5.0 and S+% = 6.3 at birth.200IU HBIG/6-12 h,2 w+5 μg(R)/0-1-6 mMothers' age, uterine contraction+%, duration of uterine contraction, E+% and HBV+%, and newborns' gestation weeks and birth weight were similar between BF and FF.
14.Meng [31]20044Mar. 2001-Mar. 2003Guangdong, China134 cases6 monthsProspectivePCW, S+; normal ALT; 200IU-HBIG treatment (66 cases).S+% = 16.4, E+% = 6.7 and DNA+% = 2.2 at birth.0-1-6 mNo foetus abnormality, no history of treatment of anti-virus drugs during pregnancy, TORCH syndrome and other diseases.
15.Mou [32]20055Sept. 2001-Oct. 2003Shandong, China91 cases12 monthsProspectivePCW, S+; normal hepatic function; informed consent.33.0(E)37.4(DNA)DNA+% = 13.2 (U) at birth.200IU HBIG/12 h,2 w+0-1-6 m with booster.≥ 1Exclusion for those with premature birth, low birth weight, asphyxia and history of bleeding during pregnancy, breastfeed < 1 month.Mothers' E+% and DNA+%, newborns' gestation weeks, birth weight and DNA+% (U) were similar between BF and FF.
16.Zhang [33]200542000-2004Ningxia, China104 cases12 monthsProspectivePCW, S+; 200IU-HBIG treatment.100(E)200IU HBIG/24 h, 1 m+10 μg(R)/2-3-6 mNatural delivery% = 50.0
17.Zhang [34]20053Jan. 2001-Feb. 2002Chongqing, China67 cases12-18 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+; 100IU-HBIG treatment.28.4(E)200IU HBIG/24 h+100IU HBIG/15d+10 μg(R)/2-3-6 mMothers' E+% was higher in FF than BF.
18.Qiu [35]20053Dec. 2002-Mar. 2004Zhejiang, China90 cases6 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+; normal hepatic function; no nipple crack; 200IU-HBIG treatment.100(E)Healthy; complete gestation weeks.200IU HBIG/6 h+5 μg (R)/12 h-1-6 m> 6Mothers' age and DNA+%, newborns' gestation weeks were similar between BF and FF.
19.Zeng [36]20064Jun. 2001-Dec. 2003Guangxi, China115 cases7 monthsProspectivePCW, S+; normal ALT; 200IU-HBIG treatment.31.3(E)Apgar > 7; birth weight > 2500 g; S+% = 12.2 at birth.200IU HBIG/24 h, 1 m+ 5 μg (R)/72 h-1-6 m> 0.5Mothers' E+%, newborns' gender, birth weight and HBV+% at birth were similar between BF and FF.
20.Ma [7]200641993-1999Liaoning, China167 cases9 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.54(E)Birth temperature < 37°C; birth weight > 2500 g; apgar > 8.(R)/0-1-6 mMothers' E+% was similar between BF and FF.
21.Chen [37]20064Mar. 2002-May. 2005Zhejiang, China170 cases12 monthsRetrospectiveAPCW, S+; normal hepatic function; informed consent.41.2(E)DNA+% = 9.4(U).200IU HBIG/12 h,14 d+5 μg(R)/0-1 -6 m with booster≥ 1Exclusion for those with premature birth, low birth weight, asphyxia and history of bleeding during pregnancy, breastfeeding below one month.Mothers' E+% and DNA+%, newborns' birth weight, gestation weeks and DNA+% were similar between BF and FF.
22.Zuo [38]20074May 2004-May 2005Hebei, China180 cases12 monthsprospectivePCW, S+; 200IU-HBIG treatment.49.4(E)S+% = 6.7 and DNA+% = 4.2 at birth.200IU HBIG/48 h,1 m,3 m+5 μg(R)/24 h-1 -6 m10The infants were randomized into two groups.Mothers' age, E+% and DNA+%, newborns' birth weight, method of delivery, S+% and DNA+% were similar between BF and FF.
23.Wang [39]20073Oct. 2003-Jan. 2006Ningxia, China165 cases10-12 monthsRetrospectiveAPCW, S+.0(E)S+% = 11.5 and E+% = 2.4.200IU HBIG/6 h+5 μg(R)/2 d-1-6 mMothers' age and DNA level, newborns' sex ratio, birth weight and method of delivery were similar between BF and FF.
24.Qin [40]20073Jan. 2001-Jan. 2005Henan, China74 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, DNA+; 200IU-HBIG treatment.100(DNA)DNA+% = 4.5 at birth200IU HBIG/16 h+10 μg(R)/1-2-7 m or 10 μg(R)/0-1-6 m
25.Chen [41]20084Oct. 2002-Aug. 2007Beijing, China345 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.0(E and DNA)10 μg(R)/0-1-6 m+ 100-200IU HBIG/24 h, 15-30d(241 cases).Proportion of infants who received HBIG was higher in FF than BF.
26.Hou [42]20094Jan. 2002-NAShenzhen, China369 cases9-15 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+; abnormal ALT/AST% = 2.2.13.6(E)100IU HBIG/1 d+5 μg(R)/0-1-6 m with booster.4.9Mothers' age, abnormal ALT/AST%, E+%, CM+% and CG+%, newborns' sex ratio were similar between BF and FF.
27.Li [43]200922004-2007Shandong, China45 cases12 monthsRetrospectiveAPCW, S+; normal hepatic function; 200IU-HBIG treatment.33.3(E)DNA+% = 10.0 at birth.200 IU HBIG/12 h, 2 w+ 0-1-6 m with booster.Mothers' E+% and DNA+%, newborns' gestation weeks, birth weight and DNA+% were similar between BF and FF.
28.Luo [44]201042007-2009Fujian, China436 cases6 monthsretrospectivePCW, S+; normal hepatic function; 200IU-HBIG treatment.44.0(E)200 IU HBIG/12 h, 2 w+5 μg(R)/0-1-6 m> 6Mothers' E+% and DNA+% were higher in FF than BF.
29.Chen [45]201032001-2009Shandong, China278 cases8-12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+; 200IU-HBIG voluntary treatment.200IU HBIG/24 h,2 w or 200IU HBIG/24 h +0-1-6 m or 0-1-2-7 mMothers' age range was 21-40 years old.
30.Sun [46]20102Nov. 2007-Jul. 2008Shandong, China69 cases12 monthsretrospectivePCW, S+.DNA-at birthHBIG+(R)/0-1-6 m
31.Liu [47]20104Jan. 2009-Mar. 2010Guangdong, China145 cases12 monthsretrospectivePCW, S+; 200IU-HBIG treatment.58.1(DNA)200IU HBIG+5 μg (R)/0-1-6 m> 6Mothers' DNA+%, age, time of pregnancy and delivery, methods of delivery, newborns' birth weight, S+% and DNA+% at birth were similar between BF and FF.
32.Wu [48]20103Sept. 2007-May. 2009Guangdong, China46 cases12 monthsRetrospectivePCW, S+.100 (both E and DNA)200IU HBIG/6 h+5 μg(R)/0-1-6 mMothers' age, newborns' sex ratio, birth weight and methods of delivery were similar between BF and FF.

NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; NA: not available; BF: breastfeeding; FF: formula feeding; hepatitis B immunoglobulin: HBIG; APCW: asymptomatic prenatal care women; PCW: prenatal care women; S: HBsAg; E: HBeAg; C: HBcAb; CG: HBcAb IgG; CM: HBcAb IgM; DNA: HBV DNA; P: plasma-derived vaccine; R: recombinant vaccine; U: umbilical cord blood; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; IU: international unit; m: month; w: week; d: day; h: hours; ml: millilitre; kg: kilogram; μg: microgram; DBF: duration of breastfeeding

*1: HBIG treatment: HBIG was received by the mothers at the gestation weeks of 28 th, 32 th and 36 th each.

*2: One boost dose was given to those infants with negative HBsAb status.

General characteristic and quality score of the 32 studies included in this meta analysis NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; NA: not available; BF: breastfeeding; FF: formula feeding; hepatitis B immunoglobulin: HBIG; APCW: asymptomatic prenatal care women; PCW: prenatal care women; S: HBsAg; E: HBeAg; C: HBcAb; CG: HBcAb IgG; CM: HBcAb IgM; DNA: HBV DNA; P: plasma-derived vaccine; R: recombinant vaccine; U: umbilical cord blood; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; IU: international unit; m: month; w: week; d: day; h: hours; ml: millilitre; kg: kilogram; μg: microgram; DBF: duration of breastfeeding *1: HBIG treatment: HBIG was received by the mothers at the gestation weeks of 28 th, 32 th and 36 th each. *2: One boost dose was given to those infants with negative HBsAb status.

Statistical analysis

The risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of effect between breastfeeding (BF) versus formula-feeding (FF) and risk of infantile CHB infection across studies. The Dersimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to pool the RDs across studies in Stata version 10.0 (Stata Corp). Heterogeneity was explored by χ2 test, with a significance set at a P value < 0.10. The extent of heterogeneity was measured by Higgins' I2. Subgroup analysis and Meta-regression were carried out to examine the effect in relation to quality and type of study, language of paper, study sites, hepatitis B vaccination of the mothers and infants, and mothers' infectivity if available. We used the test for interaction to estimate the difference between two subgroups [19]. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of a funnel plot, the Egger's and Begger's test [20], and a nonparametric trim and fill method was performed [21].

Results

1. Literature search

The search retrieved 517 papers, and 99 out of which were potentially relevant to current analysis. Further backward search produced 3 additional papers. Only 32 papers [7,10-13,22-48] which offered 32 independent studies were included in our analysis and the reasons for exclusion of the others were listed in Additional file 1-Figure S1.

2. General characteristics about the studies included in meta analysis

The 32 studies included in present analysis were published between 1985 and 2010 (Table 1). One study was conducted in the United States [10], one in Italy [11] and the other 30 in China, including Hongkong. Mothers decided the feeding methods in all studies except one in which they were randomized [38]. The sample size of the studies ranged from 38 to 436 (median, 143), with the ratio of BF versus FF infants of 0.09-5.07 (median, 0.94).

3. The risk difference (RD) of infantile CHB infection with methods of feeding

The 32 studies contributed 5650 infants and 244 CHB outcomes with an overall transmission rate of 4.32%. The difference between the risk of infantile CHB infection among BF and FF infants (RD) determined by the random-effects model was -0.8%, (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.6%, 0.1%) (Figure 1) and that determined by the fixed-effects model was -0.4% (95% CI: -1.6%, 0.7%). The findings suggest that BF is not associated with additional risk of infantile CHB infection concurred with that of all the individual studies, except one [11], which suggests that BF is associated with a lower risk than FF.
Figure 1

Effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers analyzed by a random-effects model. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B.

Effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers analyzed by a random-effects model. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B. Subgroup studies showed that the RDs could be modified by language of paper and quality of study, but not by type of study, study sites or infant-mother vaccination. The studies in English or with high quality tended to report lower RDs, which would probably reflect the difference of mothers' HBV infectivity (Table 2).
Table 2

Proportion of the mothers with high infectivity overall, by language and quality of papers

GroupsBreastfeedingFormula feeding


No of high infectivity/Total NoProportion ofhigh infectivity (%)No of high infectivity/Total NoProportion ofhigh infectivity (%)
All studies739/200136.9812/184344.1
Language of papers
 English29/9032. 260/23925.1
 Chinese710/191137.2752/160446.9
Quality of papers
 high37/10933.971/21233.5
 low702/189237.1741/163145.4

CHB: chronic hepatitis B infection

Proportion of the mothers with high infectivity overall, by language and quality of papers CHB: chronic hepatitis B infection Data on HBV infectivity available from 16 of the 32 studies showed that 42.0% (1648/3924) of mothers were designated with "high infectivity", being positive for either the HBeAg and/or the HBV DNA, and that the proportion of these mothers was lower among those who elected to BF (36.9%, 739/2001) than those who elected to FF (44.1%, 812/1843) (Table 2). The overall RD was -0.4% (95% CI: -1.4%, 0.7%), which was not modified by language of paper, quality and type of study, study sites or infant-mother vaccination by both subgroup analysis and Meta regression. And the RD determined for mothers with high infectivity was 0.7% (95% CI: -2.0%, 3.5%), which was not significantly different (Z = 0.789, P > 0.05) from that determined for mothers with low infectivity, -0.5% (95% CI: -1.7%, 0.6%) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers with high and low HBV infectivity analyzed by a random-effects model. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B.

Effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers with high and low HBV infectivity analyzed by a random-effects model. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B.

4. Publication bias and its correction

Visual inspection of the funnel plots demonstrated a possible publication bias. After trim and fill methods were performed, the pooled RDs were -1.0% (95%CI: -1.8%, -0.1%) and -0.6% (95%CI: -1.6%, 0.5%) respectively for the 32 and 16 studies (Figure 3, 4).
Figure 3

The Egger's funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits for the 32 studies on the effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B. The circles alone and enclosed with square represented respectively the included and filled studies.

Figure 4

The Egger's funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits for the 16 studies on the effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers with high and low infectivity. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B. The circles alone and enclosed with square represented respectively the included and filled studies.

The Egger's funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits for the 32 studies on the effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B. The circles alone and enclosed with square represented respectively the included and filled studies. The Egger's funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits for the 16 studies on the effect of breastfeeding on occurrence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection among the infants born of CHB mothers with high and low infectivity. RD: risk difference; CI: confidence interval; CHB: chronic hepatitis B. The circles alone and enclosed with square represented respectively the included and filled studies.

Discussion

Our results suggest that breastfeeding by CHB mothers does not pose a significant risk of infection by the virus, provided that the infants have been vaccinated against HBV at birth. In this meta analysis, the overall transmission rate of HBV from CHB mothers to their infants who had completed routine hepatitis B vaccination was 4.32%, which was similar to those previously reported [3]. Mother-to-infant transmission of HBV can occur prenatally, at birth and postnatally [49], but most commonly infection occurs at the time of delivery. In-utero transmission is very uncommon, except in China and Japan, and often persists after birth, which results in the ineffectiveness of HBV vaccination, i.e., immunoprophylaxis [49,50]. From this perspective, most mother-to-infant transmission occurs before deciding on infant feeding methods. But there is an exception: the neonate can be infected postnatally by household contact with CHB family members [51]. Apparently, breastfeeding would produce more frequent contacts between mother and infant than formula-feeding. Though separation of breastfed transmission of CHB from contact seems to be important in the clarification of the net effect of breastfeeding on infantile CHB infection, this contact transmission occurs only at the successful exchange of body fluid from infected mothers to their infants under some special situations, such as excoriation. Thus breastfed transmission of HBV, if existed, should be minimal. Two previous meta analyses reported different associations of breastfeeding and infantile CHB infection with an odds ratio (OR) = 1.68 (95%CI: 1.16, 2.44) [52] and 0.67 (95%CI: 0.41, 1.12) [53] respectively based on 13 and 10 studies. The inconsistent results reflected difference between the studies with respect to their study aim, search strategies, criteria of inclusion and exclusion of the studies, and analysis strategies. One study included both vaccinated and not vaccinated infants [52] and the other included only those who had been given both passive and active immunization [53]. After careful evaluation on these two analyses, we identified their obvious shortcomings: (1) many eligible studies were not included in these analyses without any reason; (2) the analyses excluded those studies with zero outcome of infantile CHB infection in both groups of feeding methods; (3) neither of the studies evaluated the quality of the included studies and their influence on the results, and (4) neither of the studies considered the possible confounding of mothers' infectivity, which was important in mother-to-infant transmission of HBV and their decisions on how to feed their infants [17,54]. In our meta analysis, reference search, data extraction and quality evaluation were done by two independent investigators and examined by the third one before a consensus was reached, thus the completeness and appropriateness of the studies included for analysis were ensured. We used RD instead of OR or risk ratio (RR) as effect measure, which ensured that a reasonable estimation of effect measurement remained untouched and the 2nd shortcoming mentioned above was overcome simultaneously. Our findings have important implications for current clinical practice about breastfeeding by CHB mothers, even with high infectivity. Routine hepatitis B vaccination allows the infant to enjoy breastfeeding, the nutritional, immunological and psychological advantages of which are well known[4]. And breastfeeding would also greatly benefit the mother[4], especially in weakening or eliminating her fear and guilt which occur often. Unfortunately, contrary to our findings that risk of breastfed transmission of infantile CHB infection simply does not exist, the current clinical practices seem discouraging: (1) any breastfeeding rate is about 30% lower for those mothers with than without CHB [54], and even lower (5.4% only) for those with high infectivity [55]; (2) there is still 25%-50% of the medical professionals did not recommend infantile breastfeeding by CHB mothers [15,16]. Thus, health education of breastfeeding with correct knowledge, attitude and behaviour on the decision makers, such as medical professional and CHB mothers, seems to be urgent, especially in those epidemic countries, like China. This meta analysis demonstrates no association between breastfeeding and risk of infantile CHB infection from a CHB mother to her infant. Two alternative explanations must be considered. First, a systematic bias may be present in follow-up studies arising from differential lost to follow-up, which has not been mentioned in most of the studies. Second, the studied population varies from study to study, and some unknown confounders may not be effectively evaluated. Further evaluation of the effect of breastfeeding from an HBV infected mother and infantile CHB infection while taking into consideration of potential biases can be feasibly achieved with more large-scale prospective follow-up studies.

Conclusions

Breast milk is infectious; yet, breastfeeding, even by mothers with high infectivity, is not associated with demonstrable risk of infection of infantile CHB. This may be partly because infection mainly occurs during delivery and the protection by vaccination. The finding concurs with that of individual studies and supports the WHO recommendation of BF, irrespective of the HBV status of the mothers.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

YJZ conceived, coordinated the study and drafted the manuscript. YL participated in the design and data analysis. QY and YQZ participated in the design, reference search and data extraction. YX participated in quality rating and data analysis. QQY and SW participated in quality rating, data extraction and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/502/prepub

Additional file 1

Figure S1 Flow chart for the process of retrieving papers in our meta analysis. CBM: Chinese BioMedical Literature database, CNKI: Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. Click here for file
  23 in total

1.  Hepatitis B and breastfeeding. World Health Organization.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care       Date:  1998-07

2.  Breastfeeding does not pose any additional risk of immunoprophylaxis failure on infants of HBV carrier mothers.

Authors:  J S Wang; Q R Zhu; X H Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Letter: HBAg in breast milk.

Authors:  C C Linnemann; S Goldberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Evidence against breast-feeding as a mechanism for vertical transmission of hepatitis B.

Authors:  R P Beasley; C E Stevens; I S Shiao; H C Meng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Impact of an education campaign on management in pregnancy of women infected with a blood-borne virus.

Authors:  Michelle L Giles; Suzanne M Garland; Sonia R Grover; Sharon M Lewin; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Should hepatitis B surface antigen positive mothers breast feed?

Authors:  M de Martino; C Appendino; M Resti; M E Rossi; A T Muccioli; A Vierucci
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Survey of HBsAg-positive pregnant women and their infants regarding measures to prevent maternal-infantile transmission.

Authors:  Yan Guo; Jianqiong Liu; Liping Meng; Hu Meina; Yukai Du
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Perinatal and intrafamily transmission of hepatitis B virus in three generations of a low-prevalence population.

Authors:  Katalin Ordög; Andrea Szendrôi; Katalin Szarka; Zoltán Kugler; Márta Csire; Beatrix Kapusinszky; Jiuru Xie; Katalin Csizmadia; Judit Brojnás; Erzsébet Rusvai; Agnes Tempfli; György Berencsi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  Risk of hepatitis B transmission in breast-fed infants of chronic hepatitis B carriers.

Authors:  James B Hill; Jeanne S Sheffield; Matthew J Kim; James M Alexander; Barbara Sercely; George D Wendel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Hepatitis B virus epidemiology.

Authors:  Jennifer H MacLachlan; Benjamin C Cowie
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and pregnancy.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Tarandeep Singh; Swati Sinha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2012-09-20

3.  Hepatitis B virus infections and risk factors among the general population in Anhui Province, China: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Li; Yingjun Zheng; Adrian Liau; Biao Cai; Dongqing Ye; Feng Huang; Xiaorong Sheng; Fuyang Ge; Liu Xuan; Shun Li; Jing Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Individualized management of pregnant women with high hepatitis B virus DNA levels.

Authors:  Zhao Zhang; Chao Chen; Zhe Li; Ying-Hua Wu; Xiao-Min Xiao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Viral hepatitis and pregnancy.

Authors:  Norah A Terrault; Miriam T Levy; Ka Wang Cheung; Gonzague Jourdain
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Effectiveness of prevention of mother-to-child transmission practice in three provinces of Southern China.

Authors:  Fuzhen Wang; Hui Zheng; Guomin Zhang; Zhengrong Ding; Fangjun Li; Ge Zhong; Yuansheng Chen; Yuanxi Jia; Ning Miao; Zhenhua Wu; Xiaojin Sun; Li Li; Xiaofeng Liang; Fuqiang Cui
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Liver diseases in pregnancy: diseases not unique to pregnancy.

Authors:  Ashraf A Almashhrawi; Khulood T Ahmed; Rubayat N Rahman; Ghassan M Hammoud; Jamal A Ibdah
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Chronic hepatitis B in children and adolescents: epidemiology and management.

Authors:  Mona Abdel-Hady; Deirdre Kelly
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  A study of immunoprophylaxis failure and risk factors of hepatitis B virus mother-to-infant transmission.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Xien Gui; Bo Wang; Huiping Ji; Reziyan Yisilafu; Fengliang Li; Yun Zhou; Ling Zhang; Hui Zhang; Xiaohong Liu
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver-Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India Position Statement on Management of Liver Diseases in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Anil Arora; Ashish Kumar; Anil C Anand; Pankaj Puri; Radha K Dhiman; Subrat K Acharya; Kiran Aggarwal; Neelam Aggarwal; Rakesh Aggarwal; Yogesh K Chawla; Vinod K Dixit; Ajay Duseja; Chundamannil E Eapen; Bhabadev Goswami; Kanwal Gujral; Anoop Gupta; Ankur Jindal; Premashish Kar; Krishna Kumari; Kaushal Madan; Jaideep Malhotra; Narendra Malhotra; Gaurav Pandey; Uma Pandey; Ratna D Puri; Ramesh R Rai; Padaki N Rao; Shiv K Sarin; Aparna Sharma; Praveen Sharma; Koticherry T Shenoy; Karam R Singh; Shivaram P Singh; Vanita Suri; Nirupama Trehanpati; Manav Wadhawan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.