Literature DB >> 21707727

Information-seeking behaviour of nurses: where is information sought and what processes are followed?

Denise Fiona O'leary1, Siobhán Ni Mhaolrúnaigh.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of a study on how nurses inform their decision-making in the workplace.
BACKGROUND: Despite the growing availability of research evidence, nurses have been slow to adopt it into their daily decision-making.
METHOD: The study was undertaken in Ireland between 2006 and 2007 using a sequential mixed methods approach. In phase 1, the views of a quota sample of 29 nurses were explored using semi-structured interviews incorporating vignettes. Phase 2 involved the design and dissemination of a survey to a disproportionate stratified random sample of 1356 nurses. The response rate was 29%.
FINDINGS: In decision-making, nurses accessed other people, especially nursing colleagues, the most frequently. Sources that provided prepackaged information such as guidelines were favoured over sources that provided access to original research. The process of information-seeking for routine and non-routine decisions was different. Nurses making routine decisions relied mostly on their experience and an assessment of the patient. In non-routine decision-making, participants experienced more uncertainty about their decisions. Accordingly, sources of information used were more varied and the information-seeking process more extensive. The study highlighted the complexities of establishing whether information used in decision-making is research based or not.
CONCLUSION: Routine practices should be reviewed and updated regularly through organizational mandates, as nurses do not generally question them. Research information to inform non-routine decision-making must be easily available to nurses in their workplace, as information searches generally prioritize finding enough, rather than the best, information to make a decision.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21707727     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05750.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  11 in total

1.  PICU Nurses' Pain Assessments and Intervention Choices for Virtual Human and Written Vignettes.

Authors:  Cynthia M LaFond; Catherine Van Hulle Vincent; Colleen Corte; Patricia E Hershberger; Andrew Johnson; Chang G Park; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Therapists' use of the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) intervention: a practice implementation survey study.

Authors:  Louise A Connell; Naoimh E McMahon; Caroline L Watkins; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-02-06

3.  Australian graduating nurses' knowledge, intentions and beliefs on infection prevention and control: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Brett G Mitchell; Richard Say; Anne Wells; Fiona Wilson; Linda Cloete; Lucinda Matheson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2014-12-12

4.  Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Kelly Allen; Cara Waller; Tim Dyer; Vanessa Brooke; Marie Garrubba; Angela Melder; Catherine Voutier; Anthony Gust; Dina Farjou
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Describing knowledge encounters in healthcare: a mixed studies systematic review and development of a classification.

Authors:  Dominic Hurst; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 8: developing, implementing and evaluating an evidence dissemination service in a local healthcare setting.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Marie Garrubba; Angela Melder; Catherine Voutier; Cara Waller; Richard King; Wayne Ramsey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Communication tools and sources of education and information: a national survey of rural and remote nurses.

Authors:  Julie Kosteniuk; Norma J Stewart; Erin C Wilson; Kelly L Penz; Ruth Martin-Misener; Debra G Morgan; Chandima Karunanayake; Martha L P MacLeod
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  Nurses' Use of a Web-Based National Guide for Child Health Care.

Authors:  Johanna Tell; Ewy Olander; Peter Anderberg; Johan Sanmartin Berglund
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Acting on audit & feedback: a qualitative instrumental case study in mental health services in Norway.

Authors:  Monica Stolt Pedersen; Anne Landheim; Merete Møller; Lars Lien
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  What factors influence community wound care in the UK? A focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  Trish A Gray; Paul Wilson; Jo C Dumville; Nicky A Cullum
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.