AIMS: ERG rearrangements, mostly resulting in TMPRSS2-ERG fusions, are frequent alterations in prostate cancer (PCa), with a frequency ranging from 15% to 78%. As the reason for this variability is unknown, our aim was to investigate the ERG rearrangement frequency with a cohort design. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed three well-defined cohorts for ERG rearrangements, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The first cohort comprised 119 prostatectomy specimens. The second and third cohorts included incidentally diagnosed PCa [71 cystoprostatectomy specimens, and 105 transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) specimens]. Seventy of 119 (59%) cases of the prostatectomy cohort harboured ERG rearrangements. Regarding zonal origin, 2/11 (18%) transition zone (TZ) foci and 75/145 (52%) peripheral zone (PZ) foci harboured ERG rearrangements. Within the cystoprostatectomies, 24/71 (34%) cases harboured ERG rearrangements. Regarding zonal origin, 2/9 (22%) TZ foci and 26/86 (30%) PZ foci harboured ERG rearrangements. PCa incidentally identified by TURP harboured ERG rearrangements in 31/105 (29%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: ERG rearrangements occur in TZ PCa, although at a lower frequency than in PZ PCa. We confirmed that approximately half of all prostatectomies harbour ERG rearrangements. However, the frequency in incidentally diagnosed PCa cohorts was significantly lower, even if multifocality was considered. Consequently, zonal origin and cohort design are key for studying the clinical implications of ERG rearrangements.
AIMS: ERG rearrangements, mostly resulting in TMPRSS2-ERG fusions, are frequent alterations in prostate cancer (PCa), with a frequency ranging from 15% to 78%. As the reason for this variability is unknown, our aim was to investigate the ERG rearrangement frequency with a cohort design. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed three well-defined cohorts for ERG rearrangements, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The first cohort comprised 119 prostatectomy specimens. The second and third cohorts included incidentally diagnosed PCa [71 cystoprostatectomy specimens, and 105 transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) specimens]. Seventy of 119 (59%) cases of the prostatectomy cohort harboured ERG rearrangements. Regarding zonal origin, 2/11 (18%) transition zone (TZ) foci and 75/145 (52%) peripheral zone (PZ) foci harboured ERG rearrangements. Within the cystoprostatectomies, 24/71 (34%) cases harboured ERG rearrangements. Regarding zonal origin, 2/9 (22%) TZ foci and 26/86 (30%) PZ foci harboured ERG rearrangements. PCa incidentally identified by TURP harboured ERG rearrangements in 31/105 (29%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: ERG rearrangements occur in TZ PCa, although at a lower frequency than in PZ PCa. We confirmed that approximately half of all prostatectomies harbour ERG rearrangements. However, the frequency in incidentally diagnosed PCa cohorts was significantly lower, even if multifocality was considered. Consequently, zonal origin and cohort design are key for studying the clinical implications of ERG rearrangements.
Authors: Ramy A Abdelsalam; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Alan Box; Maria Kalantarian; Sunita Ghosh; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Tamara Lotfi; Mohammed Shahait; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Tarek A Bismar Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Cindy Ke Zhou; Denise Young; Edward D Yeboah; Sally B Coburn; Yao Tettey; Richard B Biritwum; Andrew A Adjei; Evelyn Tay; Shelley Niwa; Ann Truelove; Judith Welsh; James E Mensah; Robert N Hoover; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Ann W Hsing; Shiv Srivastava; Michael B Cook Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anuradha Gopalan; Margaret A Leversha; Maria E Dudas; Alexandra C Maschino; Jeremy Chang; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine Journal: Histopathology Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: F Huber; M Montani; T Sulser; R Jaggi; P Wild; H Moch; H Gevensleben; M Schmid; S Wyder; G Kristiansen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Steven C Smith; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Kimberly A Zuhlke; Anna M Johnson; Javed Siddiqui; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Lakshmi P Kunju; Kathleen A Cooney; Scott A Tomlins Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: David Adler; Jacqueline Ochsenfahrt; Kerstin Fuchs; Glen Kristiansen; Sven Perner; Nicolas Wernert Journal: Int J Mol Med Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 4.101
Authors: Niklas Klümper; Isabella Syring; Sven Perner; Felix Bremmer; Anne Offermann; David Adler; Wenzel Vogel; Stefan C Müller; Jörg Ellinger; Arne Strauß; Heinz Joachim Radzun; Philipp Ströbel; Johannes Brägelmann Journal: Diagn Pathol Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.196