Literature DB >> 21707562

The Difficult Airway Society 'ADEPT' guidance on selecting airway devices: the basis of a strategy for equipment evaluation.

J J Pandit1, M T Popat, T M Cook, A R Wilkes, P Groom, H Cooke, A Kapila, E O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

Faced with the concern that an increasing number of airway management devices were being introduced into clinical practice with little or no prior evidence of their clinical efficacy or safety, the Difficult Airway Society formed a working party (Airway Device Evaluation Project Team) to establish a process by which the airway management community within the profession could itself lead a process of formal device/equipment evaluation. Although there are several national and international regulations governing which products can come on to the market and be legitimately sold, there has hitherto been no formal professional guidance relating to how products should be selected (i.e. purchased). The Airway Device Evaluation Project Team's first task was to formulate such advice, emphasising evidence-based principles. Team discussions led to a definition of the minimum level of evidence needed to make a pragmatic decision about the purchase or selection of an airway device. The Team concluded that this definition should form the basis of a professional standard, guiding those with responsibility for selecting airway devices. We describe how widespread adoption of this professional standard can act as a driver to create an infrastructure in which the required evidence can be obtained. Essential elements are that: (i) the Difficult Airway Society facilitates a coherent national network of research-active units; and (ii) individual anaesthetists in hospital trusts play a more active role in local purchasing decisions, applying the relevant evidence and communicating their purchasing decisions to the Difficult Airway Society.
© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21707562     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06787.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  19 in total

1.  Value of knowing physical characteristics of the airway device before using it.

Authors:  A A J Van Zundert; M W Skinner; T C R V Van Zundert; S R Luney; J J Pandit
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The MacGyver bias and attraction of homemade devices in healthcare.

Authors:  Laura V Duggan; Stuart D Marshall; Jeanette Scott; Peter G Brindley; Hilary P Grocott
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Modified Retrograde Nasal Intubation: A New Airway Technique and Devices.

Authors:  Vernon H Vivian; Dip Anaes; Tyson L Pardon; Andre A J Van Zundert
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2021-06-01

4.  Newer airway devices: Future promising?

Authors:  S Bala Bhaskar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-09

5.  The Availability of Advanced Airway Equipment and Experience with Videolaryngoscopy in the UK: Two UK Surveys.

Authors:  Rachel L Gill; Audrey S Y Jeffrey; Alistair F McNarry; Geoffrey H C Liew
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2015-01-05

6.  Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  M C Mushambi; S M Kinsella; M Popat; H Swales; K K Ramaswamy; A L Winton; A C Quinn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Making endotracheal intubation easy and successful, particularly in unexpected difficult airway.

Authors:  Susanne Abdulla; Sina Abdulla; Karl-Peter Schwemm; Regina Eckhardt; Walied Abdulla
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01

8.  Extraglottic airway devices: A review.

Authors:  Ramesh Ramaiah; Debasmita Das; Sanjay M Bhananker; Aaron M Joffe
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  A review of video laryngoscopes relevant to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Dharshi Karalapillai; Jai Darvall; Justin Mandeville; Louise Ellard; Jon Graham; Laurence Weinberg
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07

10.  A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu® AuraGain™: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Devangi A Parikh; Ruchi A Jain; Smita S Lele; Bharati A Tendolkar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.