Literature DB >> 21707214

The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.

Vanessa M Loaiza1, David P McCabe, Jessie L Youngblood, Nathan S Rose, Joel Myerson.   

Abstract

Recent research in working memory has highlighted the similarities involved in retrieval from complex span tasks and episodic memory tasks, suggesting that these tasks are influenced by similar memory processes. In the present article, the authors manipulated the level of processing engaged when studying to-be-remembered words during a reading span task (Experiment 1) and an operation span task (Experiment 2) in order to assess the role of retrieval from secondary memory during complex span tasks. Immediate recall from both span tasks was greater for items studied under deep processing instructions compared with items studied under shallow processing instructions regardless of trial length. Recall was better for deep than for shallow levels of processing on delayed recall tests as well. These data are consistent with the primary-secondary memory framework, which suggests that to-be-remembered items are displaced from primary memory (i.e., the focus of attention) during the processing phases of complex span tasks and therefore must be retrieved from secondary memory. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21707214     DOI: 10.1037/a0023923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Timothy Jones; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

3.  Computer-aided cognitive rehabilitation improves cognitive performances and induces brain functional connectivity changes in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients: an exploratory study.

Authors:  S Bonavita; R Sacco; M Della Corte; S Esposito; M Sparaco; A d'Ambrosio; R Docimo; A Bisecco; L Lavorgna; D Corbo; S Cirillo; A Gallo; F Esposito; G Tedeschi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Short-term retention of a single word relies on retrieval from long-term memory when both rehearsal and refreshing are disrupted.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07

5.  Does Controlling for Temporal Parameters Change the Levels-of-Processing Effect in Working Memory?

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  Younger and Late Middle-Aged Adults Exhibit Different Patterns of Cognitive-Motor Interference During Locomotor Adaptation, With No Disruption of Savings.

Authors:  Cristina Rossi; Ryan T Roemmich; Nicolas Schweighofer; Amy J Bastian; Kristan A Leech
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  What's "up"? Impaired Spatial Preposition Processing in Posterior Cortical Atrophy.

Authors:  Zubaida Shebani; Peter J Nestor; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The long-term consequences of retrieval demands during working memory.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; Charlotte Doherty; Paul Howlett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01

9.  Individual differences in working memory capacity moderate effects of post-learning activity on memory consolidation over the long term.

Authors:  Markus Martini; Robert Marhenke; Caroline Martini; Sonja Rossi; Pierre Sachse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.