Literature DB >> 2170700

Changing the needle when inoculating blood cultures. A no-benefit and high-risk procedure.

M K Leisure1, D M Moore, J D Schwartzman, G F Hayden, L G Donowitz.   

Abstract

Although the Centers for Disease Control recommends that needles should never be recapped, many phlebotomists routinely recap and change needles before blood culture inoculation. This study compared the extrinsic contamination rate in blood cultures when the needle was and was not changed. One hundred eight medical students obtained 182 blood specimens from each other by means of standard methods. Each specimen was inoculated into two culture bottles. The first bottle was inoculated with the needle used for phlebotomy, and the second was inoculated after needle change. Four (2.2%) of 182 bottles were contaminated when the needle was not changed, compared with one (0.6%) when the needle was changed. This small difference was not statistically significant, and the likelihood of having failed to detect a 5% difference in contamination rate was small. The risk of needle-stick injury incurred by changing the needle before inoculation of blood culture bottles seems to be unjustified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2170700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  5 in total

Review 1.  Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  L G Reimer; M L Wilson; M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress.

Authors:  Melvin P Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem

Authors:  Gary V Doern; Karen C Carroll; Daniel J Diekema; Kevin W Garey; Mark E Rupp; Melvin P Weinstein; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Population-based epidemiology and microbiology of community-onset bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; Deirdre L Church
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.