Literature DB >> 21706380

Outreach programs, peer pressure, and common sense: what motivates homeowners to mitigate wildfire risk?

Sarah M McCaffrey1, Melanie Stidham, Eric Toman, Bruce Shindler.   

Abstract

In recent years, altered forest conditions, climate change, and the increasing numbers of homes built in fire prone areas has meant that wildfires are affecting more people. An important part of minimizing the potential negative impacts of wildfire is engaging homeowners in mitigating the fire hazard on their land. It is therefore important to understand what makes homeowners more or less willing to take action. The research presented here comes from a study that interviewed a total of 198 homeowners in six communities in the western United States about the activities they had undertaken to mitigate their fire risk, the factors that contributed to their decisions, and their future intentions. The current paper reports on findings from the first half of the longitudinal study, after 3 years we will return to interview the current homeowner on the same properties to assess maintenance actions and facilitating and limiting factors. Overall we found a body of individuals who understand the fire risk, are taking numerous mitigation actions, and think that these actions have reduced their risk. These homeowners typically did not expect the government to do it for them: they wanted information about what to do and, in some cases, assistance with the work, but saw taking care of their property primarily as their responsibility. Responses also show that key information sources and motivating factors vary by location and that it is not inherently necessary to have relationships between community members to create defensible space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21706380     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9704-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Fire-induced erosion and millennial-scale climate change in northern ponderosa pine forests.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pierce; Grant A Meyer; A J Timothy Jull
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.

Authors:  A L Westerling; H G Hidalgo; D R Cayan; T W Swetnam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Creating defensible space in the wildland-urban interface: the influence of values on perceptions and behavior.

Authors:  Alan D Bright; Randall T Burtz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Correct and incorrect interpretations of correlations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; M Nicolich
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.267

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Perceptions of wildfire and landscape change in the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska.

Authors:  Jason S Gordon; Joshua B Gruver; Courtney G Flint; A E Luloff
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Landscape Preferences, Amenity, and Bushfire Risk in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Nicholas Gill; Olivia Dun; Chris Brennan-Horley; Christine Eriksen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Trying not to get burned: understanding homeowners' wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors.

Authors:  Hannah Brenkert-Smith; Patricia A Champ; Nicholas Flores
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  An Integrative Review of Empirical Research on Perceptions and Behaviors Related to Prescribed Burning and Wildfire in the United States.

Authors:  Lauren Nicole Dupéy; Jordan W Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Does Wildfire Open a Policy Window? Local Government and Community Adaptation After Fire in the United States.

Authors:  Miranda H Mockrin; Hillary K Fishler; Susan I Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.