OBJECTIVE: Inflammation plays an important role in lung carcinogenesis. Epidemiologic studies have reported inverse associations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and lung cancer risk. Previously, we found that ever use of glucosamine and chondroitin, which have anti-inflammatory properties, were inversely associated with lung cancer risk. After an additional year of follow-up, we further examined the association including frequency/duration of use, interaction with factors associated with inflammation, and lung cancer histology. METHODS: Participants were members of the VITamins And Lifestyle cohort. Adults, aged 50-76 years, who were residents of western Washington State, completed a baseline questionnaire in 2000-2002 (n = 76,904). Participants were queried on their use of glucosamine and chondroitin, over the 10 years prior to baseline, and categorized as nonuser, low use < 4 days/week or < 3 years, or high use ≥ 4 days/week and ≥ 3 years. Lung cancer cases (n = 808) were ascertained through linkage to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. RESULTS: High 10-year use of glucosamine [hazard ratio (HR), 0.77; 95% CI: 0.56-1.07; p trend = 0.04] but not chondroitin was associated with a reduction in lung cancer risk. The association with glucosamine was limited to adenocarcinoma (HR, 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27-0.90; p trend <0.01) and was not modified by NSAID use or smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: Our results for glucosamine use are similar to the prior human studies of NSAID use and lung cancer, both in magnitude and the limitation of the association to adenocarcinoma. Unlike NSAIDs, glucosamine has no known adverse effects. Although confirmatory studies are needed, glucosamine is an attractive candidate for lung cancer chemoprevention.
OBJECTIVE:Inflammation plays an important role in lung carcinogenesis. Epidemiologic studies have reported inverse associations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and lung cancer risk. Previously, we found that ever use of glucosamine and chondroitin, which have anti-inflammatory properties, were inversely associated with lung cancer risk. After an additional year of follow-up, we further examined the association including frequency/duration of use, interaction with factors associated with inflammation, and lung cancer histology. METHODS:Participants were members of the VITamins And Lifestyle cohort. Adults, aged 50-76 years, who were residents of western Washington State, completed a baseline questionnaire in 2000-2002 (n = 76,904). Participants were queried on their use of glucosamine and chondroitin, over the 10 years prior to baseline, and categorized as nonuser, low use < 4 days/week or < 3 years, or high use ≥ 4 days/week and ≥ 3 years. Lung cancer cases (n = 808) were ascertained through linkage to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. RESULTS: High 10-year use of glucosamine [hazard ratio (HR), 0.77; 95% CI: 0.56-1.07; p trend = 0.04] but not chondroitin was associated with a reduction in lung cancer risk. The association with glucosamine was limited to adenocarcinoma (HR, 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27-0.90; p trend <0.01) and was not modified by NSAID use or smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: Our results for glucosamine use are similar to the prior human studies of NSAID use and lung cancer, both in magnitude and the limitation of the association to adenocarcinoma. Unlike NSAIDs, glucosamine has no known adverse effects. Although confirmatory studies are needed, glucosamine is an attractive candidate for lung cancer chemoprevention.
Authors: C Siemes; L E Visser; J W W Coebergh; A Hofman; A G Uitterlinden; B H Ch Stricker Journal: Curr Cancer Drug Targets Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.428
Authors: Christopher G Slatore; David H Au; Alyson J Littman; Jessie A Satia; Emily White Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jessie A Satia; Alyson Littman; Christopher G Slatore; Joseph A Galanko; Emily White Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Dima M Qato; G Caleb Alexander; Rena M Conti; Michael Johnson; Phil Schumm; Stacy Tessler Lindau Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Florian Otto; John A Baron; Powel H Brown; John Burn; Peter Greenwald; Janusz Jankowski; Carlo La Vecchia; Frank Meyskens; Hans Jörg Senn; Michael Thun Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Peter M Rothwell; F Gerald R Fowkes; Jill F F Belch; Hisao Ogawa; Charles P Warlow; Tom W Meade Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Griffith A Bell; Elizabeth D Kantor; Johanna W Lampe; Danny D Shen; Emily White Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Elizabeth D Kantor; Johanna W Lampe; Sandi L Navarro; Xiaoling Song; Ginger L Milne; Emily White Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Elizabeth D Kantor; Christina C Newton; Edward L Giovannucci; Marjorie L McCullough; Peter T Campbell; Eric J Jacobs Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Elizabeth D Kantor; Johanna W Lampe; Thomas L Vaughan; Ulrike Peters; Colin D Rehm; Emily White Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Elizabeth D Kantor; Kelli O'Connell; Mengmeng Du; Chao Cao; Xuehong Zhang; Dong Hoon Lee; Yin Cao; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Alissa K Greenberg; Jun-Chieh Tsay; Kam-Meng Tchou-Wong; Anna Jorgensen; William N Rom Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 6.639