RATIONALE: Swim test susceptible (SUS) rats selectively bred for reduced struggling in the forced swim test (FST) following stress show high voluntary ethanol intake like alcohol-preferring (P) rats selectively bred for ethanol preference. It is unknown whether stress enhances drinking in SUS rats or FST behavior in P and non-preferring (NP) rats. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the response to stress in male SUS, Sprague-Dawley (SD), P, and NP rats on 10% ethanol drinking and FST behavior. METHODS: In experiment 1, SUS and SD rats had limited access to ethanol and water following white noise, rehousing, and forced swim stress. In experiment 2, P and NP rats received footshock, white noise, restraint, or no stress prior to the FST. Rats then had continuous access to ethanol and water, and the effects of weekly exposures to stress were measured. RESULTS: SUS rats drank more ethanol (M = 2.98 g/kg) than SD rats (M = 1.26 g/kg) at baseline. Stress produced sustained increases (~33% of baseline) in ethanol intake in SUS rats. NP rats spent twice as much time immobile as P rats in the FST. Stress did not alter FST behavior in P or NP rats. Only footshock produced an increase (~29%) in ethanol intake in P rats. CONCLUSIONS: Selection for stress-induced depressive-like behavior in SUS rats is associated with enhanced stress-induced ethanol drinking. However, the selection for alcohol preference is not associated with stress-induced depressive-like behavior but is associated with footshock stress-induced ethanol drinking. In these experiments, relationships among stress, depressive-like behavior, and alcohol preference were not symmetrical.
RATIONALE: Swim test susceptible (SUS) rats selectively bred for reduced struggling in the forced swim test (FST) following stress show high voluntary ethanol intake like alcohol-preferring (P) rats selectively bred for ethanol preference. It is unknown whether stress enhances drinking in SUS rats or FST behavior in P and non-preferring (NP) rats. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the response to stress in male SUS, Sprague-Dawley (SD), P, and NP rats on 10% ethanol drinking and FST behavior. METHODS: In experiment 1, SUS and SD rats had limited access to ethanol and water following white noise, rehousing, and forced swim stress. In experiment 2, P and NP rats received footshock, white noise, restraint, or no stress prior to the FST. Rats then had continuous access to ethanol and water, and the effects of weekly exposures to stress were measured. RESULTS: SUS rats drank more ethanol (M = 2.98 g/kg) than SD rats (M = 1.26 g/kg) at baseline. Stress produced sustained increases (~33% of baseline) in ethanol intake in SUS rats. NP rats spent twice as much time immobile as P rats in the FST. Stress did not alter FST behavior in P or NP rats. Only footshock produced an increase (~29%) in ethanol intake in P rats. CONCLUSIONS: Selection for stress-induced depressive-like behavior in SUS rats is associated with enhanced stress-induced ethanol drinking. However, the selection for alcohol preference is not associated with stress-induced depressive-like behavior but is associated with footshock stress-induced ethanol drinking. In these experiments, relationships among stress, depressive-like behavior, and alcohol preference were not symmetrical.
Authors: Susan R Tate; Johnny Wu; John R McQuaid; Kevin Cummins; Chris Shriver; Marketa Krenek; Sandra A Brown Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2008-03
Authors: J D Swendsen; K R Merikangas; G J Canino; R C Kessler; M Rubio-Stipec; J Angst Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 1998 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Barbara Vollmayr; Daniel Bachteler; Valentina Vengeliene; Peter Gass; Rainer Spanagel; Fritz Henn Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2004-04-02 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Ryan W Logan; Olivia Wynne; George Maglakelidze; Changqing Zhang; Stephanie O'Connell; Nadka I Boyadjieva; Dipak K Sarkar Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Alexander F Gileta; Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Apurva S Chitre; Celine L St Pierre; Elizabeth V Joyce; Rachael J Maguire; Africa M McLeod; Natalia M Gonzales; April E Williams; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson; Shelly B Flagel; Abraham A Palmer Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 6.020