BACKGROUND: Many epidemiologic studies have considered the association between blood pressure (BP) and Alzheimer disease, yet the relationship remains poorly understood. METHODS: In parallel with work on the AlzRisk online database (www.alzrisk.org), we conducted a systematic review to identify all epidemiologic studies meeting prespecified criteria reporting on the association between hypertension, systolic BP, or diastolic BP and incident Alzheimer disease. When possible, we computed summary measures using random-effects models and explored potential heterogeneity related to age at BP assessment. RESULTS: Eighteen studies reporting on 19 populations met the eligibility criteria. We computed summary relative risks (RR(Σ)) for 3 measures of BP: hypertension (RR(Σ) = 0.97 [95% confidence interval = 0.80-1.16]); a 10-mm Hg increase in systolic BP (RR(Σ) = 0.95 [0.91-1.00]); and a 10-mm Hg increase in diastolic BP (RR(Σ) = 0.94 [0.85-1.04]). We were unable to compute summary estimates for the association between categories of systolic or diastolic BP and Alzheimer disease; however, there did not appear to be a consistent pattern across studies. After stratifying on age at BP assessment, we found a suggestion of an inverse association between late-life hypertension and Alzheimer disease and a suggestion of an adverse association between midlife diastolic hypertension and Alzheimer disease. CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing epidemiologic research, we cannot determine whether there is a causal association between BP and Alzheimer disease. Selection bias and reverse causation may account for the suggested inverse association between late-life hypertension on Alzheimer disease, but, given the expected direction of these biases, they are less likely to account for the suggestion that midlife hypertension increases risk. We advocate continuing systematic review; the AlzRisk database entry on this topic (www.alzrisk.org), which was completed in parallel with this work, will be updated as new studies are published.
BACKGROUND: Many epidemiologic studies have considered the association between blood pressure (BP) and Alzheimer disease, yet the relationship remains poorly understood. METHODS: In parallel with work on the AlzRisk online database (www.alzrisk.org), we conducted a systematic review to identify all epidemiologic studies meeting prespecified criteria reporting on the association between hypertension, systolic BP, or diastolic BP and incident Alzheimer disease. When possible, we computed summary measures using random-effects models and explored potential heterogeneity related to age at BP assessment. RESULTS: Eighteen studies reporting on 19 populations met the eligibility criteria. We computed summary relative risks (RR(Σ)) for 3 measures of BP: hypertension (RR(Σ) = 0.97 [95% confidence interval = 0.80-1.16]); a 10-mm Hg increase in systolic BP (RR(Σ) = 0.95 [0.91-1.00]); and a 10-mm Hg increase in diastolic BP (RR(Σ) = 0.94 [0.85-1.04]). We were unable to compute summary estimates for the association between categories of systolic or diastolic BP and Alzheimer disease; however, there did not appear to be a consistent pattern across studies. After stratifying on age at BP assessment, we found a suggestion of an inverse association between late-life hypertension and Alzheimer disease and a suggestion of an adverse association between midlife diastolic hypertension and Alzheimer disease. CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing epidemiologic research, we cannot determine whether there is a causal association between BP and Alzheimer disease. Selection bias and reverse causation may account for the suggested inverse association between late-life hypertension on Alzheimer disease, but, given the expected direction of these biases, they are less likely to account for the suggestion that midlife hypertension increases risk. We advocate continuing systematic review; the AlzRisk database entry on this topic (www.alzrisk.org), which was completed in parallel with this work, will be updated as new studies are published.
Authors: Sjoerd M Euser; Miranda T Schram; Albert Hofman; Rudi G J Westendorp; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Linda L Chao; Shannon T Buckley; John Kornak; Norbert Schuff; Catherine Madison; Kristine Yaffe; Bruce L Miller; Joel H Kramer; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2010 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Félix Bermejo-Pareja; Julián Benito-León; Elan D Louis; Rocío Trincado; Eva Carro; Alberto Villarejo; Agustín Gómez de la Cámara Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Ge Li; Isaac C Rhew; Jane B Shofer; Walter A Kukull; John C S Breitner; Elaine Peskind; James D Bowen; Wayne McCormick; Linda Teri; Paul K Crane; Eric B Larson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Bradley T Hyman; Creighton H Phelps; Thomas G Beach; Eileen H Bigio; Nigel J Cairns; Maria C Carrillo; Dennis W Dickson; Charles Duyckaerts; Matthew P Frosch; Eliezer Masliah; Suzanne S Mirra; Peter T Nelson; Julie A Schneider; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Bill Thies; John Q Trojanowski; Harry V Vinters; Thomas J Montine Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Amanda Kelly; Matthew Calamia; Andrey Koval; Graciela Muniz Terrera; Andrea M Piccinin; Sean Clouston; Linda B Hassing; David A Bennett; Boo Johansson; Scott M Hofer Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2016-02-25
Authors: María M Corrada; Kathleen M Hayden; Annlia Paganini-Hill; Szofia S Bullain; Jaime DeMoss; Colette Aguirre; Ron Brookmeyer; Claudia H Kawas Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Eva M Tanner; Michael S Bloom; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Julie Lynch; Wei Wang; Recai Yucel; Edward F Fitzgerald Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Antonio M Chiarelli; Mark A Fletcher; Chin Hong Tan; Kathy A Low; Edward L Maclin; Benjamin Zimmerman; Tania Kong; Alexander Gorsuch; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.556