Literature DB >> 21705890

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident duty hour new standards: history, changes, and impact on staffing of intensive care units.

Stephen M Pastores1, Michael F O'Connor, Ruth M Kleinpell, Lena Napolitano, Nicholas Ward, Heatherlee Bailey, Fred P Mollenkopf, Craig M Coopersmith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recently released new standards for supervision and duty hours for residency programs. These new standards, which will affect over 100,000 residents, take effect in July 2011. In response to these new guidelines, the Society of Critical Care Medicine convened a task force to develop a white paper on the impact of changes in resident duty hours on the critical care workforce and staffing of intensive care units. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary group of professionals with expertise in critical care education and clinical practice. DATA SOURCES AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant medical literature was accessed through a systematic MEDLINE search and by requesting references from all task force members. Material published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and other specialty organizations was also reviewed. Collaboratively and iteratively, the task force corresponded by electronic mail and held several conference calls to finalize this report. MAIN
RESULTS: The new rules mandate that all first-year residents work no more than 16 hrs continuously, preserving the 80-hr limit on the resident workweek and 10-hr period between duty periods. More senior trainees may work a maximum of 24 hrs continuously, with an additional 4 hrs permitted for handoffs. Strategic napping is strongly suggested for trainees working longer shifts.
CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour standards will compel workflow restructuring in intensive care units, which depend on residents to provide a substantial portion of care. Potential solutions include expanded utilization of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, telemedicine, offering critical care training positions to emergency medicine residents, and partnerships with hospitalists. Additional research will be necessary to evaluate the impact of the new standards on patient safety, continuity of care, resident learning, and staffing in the intensive care unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21705890     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318225776f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  17 in total

1.  Outcomes of Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Critical Care: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Janna S Landsperger; Matthew W Semler; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Arthur P Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  The Simulation-Based Assessment of Pediatric Rapid Response Teams.

Authors:  James J Fehr; Mary E McBride; John R Boulet; David J Murray
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Mind the gap: can videolaryngoscopy bridge the competency gap in neonatal endotracheal intubation among pediatric trainees? a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  S Parmekar; J L Arnold; C Anselmo; M Pammi; J Hagan; C J Fernandes; K Lingappan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Shift-to-Shift Handoff Research: Where Do We Go From Here?

Authors:  Lee Ann Riesenberg
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-03

5.  Training internists to meet critical care needs in the United States: a consensus statement from the Critical Care Societies Collaborative (CCSC).

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Comparing the information seeking strategies of residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in critical care settings.

Authors:  Thomas G Kannampallil; Laura K Jones; Vimla L Patel; Timothy G Buchman; Amy Franklin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Simulation-Based Assessment of Critical Care "Front-Line" Providers.

Authors:  Walter A Boyle; David J Murray; Mary Beth Beyatte; Justin G Knittel; Paul W Kerby; Julie Woodhouse; John R Boulet
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Telemedicine: Pediatric Applications.

Authors:  Bryan L Burke; R W Hall
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Nurse practitioner/physician assistant staffing and critical care mortality.

Authors:  Deena Kelly Costa; David J Wallace; Amber E Barnato; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Rapid Intensive Care Unit Onboarding in Response to a Pandemic.

Authors:  Fahad Alroumi; Donna Cota; Jonathan Chinea; Nakul Ravikumar; Bogdan Tiru; Victor Pinto-Plata; Mark Tidswell
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.