Literature DB >> 21705889

Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation to conventional mechanical ventilation in the early management of smoke inhalation injury in swine.

Andriy I Batchinsky1, Samuel E Burkett, Thomas B Zanders, Kevin K Chung, Dara D Regn, Bryan S Jordan, Corina Necsoiu, Ruth Nguyen, Margaret A Hanson, Michael J Morris, Leopoldo C Cancio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The role of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of early smoke inhalation injury has not been studied. We compared the effects of airway pressure release ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation on oxygenation in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by wood smoke inhalation.
DESIGN: Prospective animal study.
SETTING: Government laboratory animal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Thirty-three Yorkshire pigs.
INTERVENTIONS: Smoke inhalation injury.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anesthetized female Yorkshire pigs (n = 33) inhaled room-temperature pine-bark smoke. Before injury, the pigs were randomized to receive conventional mechanical ventilation (n = 15) or airway pressure release ventilation (n = 12) for 48 hrs after smoke inhalation. As acute respiratory distress syndrome developed (PaO2/Fio2 ratio <200), plateau pressures were limited to <35 cm H2O. Six uninjured pigs received conventional mechanical ventilation for 48 hrs and served as time controls. Changes in PaO2/Fio2 ratio, tidal volume, respiratory rate, mean airway pressure, plateau pressure, and hemodynamic variables were recorded. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. PaO2/Fio2 ratio was lower in airway pressure release ventilation vs. conventional mechanical ventilation pigs at 12, 18, and 24 hrs (p < .05) but not at 48 hrs. Tidal volumes were lower in conventional mechanical ventilation animals between 30 and 48 hrs post injury (p < .05). Respiratory rates were lower in airway pressure release ventilation at 24, 42, and 48 hrs (p < .05). Mean airway pressures were higher in airway pressure release ventilation animals between 6 and 48 hrs (p < .05). There was no difference in plateau pressures, hemodynamic variables, or survival between conventional mechanical ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation pigs.
CONCLUSIONS: In this model of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe smoke inhalation in swine, airway pressure release ventilation-treated animals developed acute respiratory distress syndrome faster than conventional mechanical ventilation-treated animals, showing a lower PaO2/Fio2 ratio at 12, 18, and 24 hrs after injury. At other time points, PaO2/Fio2 ratio was not different between conventional mechanical ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21705889     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318225b5b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  7 in total

1.  Automatic airway wall segmentation and thickness measurement for long-range optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Li Qi; Shenghai Huang; Andrew E Heidari; Cuixia Dai; Jiang Zhu; Xuping Zhang; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  In vivo detection of inhalation injury in large airway using three-dimensional long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Lidek Chou; Andriy Batchinsky; Slava Belenkiy; Joseph Jing; Tirunelveli Ramalingam; Matthew Brenner; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Inhalation Injury: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Samuel W Jones; Felicia N Williams; Bruce A Cairns; Robert Cartotto
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 4.  Therapeutic potential of products derived from mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Arezoo Mohammadipoor; Ben Antebi; Andriy I Batchinsky; Leopoldo C Cancio
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2018-11-09

5.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reconditioned in Their Own Serum Exhibit Augmented Therapeutic Properties in the Setting of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Amy L Xu; Luis A Rodriguez; Kerfoot P Walker; Arezoo Mohammadipoor; Robin M Kamucheka; Leopoldo C Cancio; Andriy I Batchinsky; Ben Antebi
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 6.  Myths and Misconceptions of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Getting Past the Noise and on to the Signal.

Authors:  Penny Andrews; Joseph Shiber; Maria Madden; Gary F Nieman; Luigi Camporota; Nader M Habashi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review.

Authors:  Patrick F Walker; Michelle F Buehner; Leslie A Wood; Nathan L Boyer; Ian R Driscoll; Jonathan B Lundy; Leopoldo C Cancio; Kevin K Chung
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.