Literature DB >> 21705100

Medicare prospective payment and the volume and intensity of skilled nursing facility services.

David C Grabowski1, Christopher C Afendulis, Thomas G McGuire.   

Abstract

In 1998, Medicare adopted a per diem Prospective Payment System (PPS) for skilled nursing facility care, which was intended to deter the use of high-cost rehabilitative services. The average per diem decreased under the PPS, but because per diems increased for greater therapy minutes, the ability of the PPS to deter the use of high-intensity services was questionable. In this study, we assess how the PPS affected the volume and intensity of Medicare services. By volume we mean the product of the number of Medicare residents in a facility and the average length-of-stay, by intensity we mean the time per week devoted to rehabilitation therapy. Our results indicate that the number of Medicare residents decreased under PPS, but rehabilitative services and therapy minutes increased while length-of-stay remained relatively constant. Not surprisingly, when subsequent Medicare policy changes increased payment rates, Medicare volume far surpassed the levels seen in the pre-PPS period.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21705100      PMCID: PMC3151304          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  17 in total

1.  Optimal payment systems for health services.

Authors:  R P Ellis; T G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Rehabilitation therapy in skilled nursing facilities: effects of Medicare's new prospective payment system.

Authors:  Chapin White
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Effects of Medicare payment changes on nursing home staffing and deficiencies.

Authors:  R Tamara Konetzka; Deokhee Yi; Edward C Norton; Kerry E Kilpatrick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Physical rehabilitation following medicare prospective payment for skilled nursing facilities.

Authors:  Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The 'quicker-and-sicker' story revisited.

Authors:  J Kosecoff; K L Kahn; W H Rogers; E J Reinisch; M J Sherwood; L V Rubenstein; D Draper; C P Roth; C Chew; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes.

Authors:  J N Morris; C Hawes; B E Fries; C D Phillips; V Mor; S Katz; K Murphy; M L Drugovich; A S Friedlob
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1990-06

7.  Does competition under Medicare Prospective Payment selectively reduce expenditures on high-cost patients?

Authors:  David Meltzer; Jeanette Chung; Anirban Basu
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  2002

8.  How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care?

Authors:  Sherry Glied; Joshua Graff Zivin
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Provider behavior under prospective reimbursement. Cost sharing and supply.

Authors:  R P Ellis; T G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Rate adjusters for Medicare under capitation.

Authors:  J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1986
View more
  23 in total

1.  Payment rates for personal care assistants and the use of long-term services and supports among those dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Authors:  Michelle Ko; Robert Newcomer; Taewoon Kang; Denis Hulett; Philip Chu; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medicare payment reform and provider entry and exit in the post-acute care market.

Authors:  Peter J Huckfeldt; Neeraj Sood; John A Romley; Alessandro Malchiodi; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Effects of payment reform in more versus less competitive markets.

Authors:  Neeraj Sood; Abby Alpert; Kayleigh Barnes; Peter Huckfeldt; José J Escarce
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Changes in Payment Regulation and Acute Care Use for Total Hip Replacement: Trends in Length of Stay, Costs, and Discharge, 1997-2012.

Authors:  Michael P Cary; Marianne Baernholdt; Elizabeth I Merwin
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 1.625

5.  Association Between Therapy Intensity and Discharge Outcomes in Aged Medicare Skilled Nursing Facilities Admissions.

Authors:  Suzanne R O'Brien; Ning Zhang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Effects of Medicare payment reform: evidence from the home health interim and prospective payment systems.

Authors:  Peter J Huckfeldt; Neeraj Sood; José J Escarce; David C Grabowski; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Thirty-Year Trends in Nursing Home Composition and Quality Since the Passage of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act.

Authors:  Shekinah A Fashaw; Kali S Thomas; Ellen McCreedy; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Do hospital-owned skilled nursing facilities provide better post-acute care quality?

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; Edward C Norton; David C Grabowski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  The Impact of Certificate-of-Need Laws on Nursing Home and Home Health Care Expenditures.

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; Omar Galarraga; Jacqueline S Zinn; David C Grabowski; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Growth in medicare expenditures for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of 1998 through 1999 and 2008.

Authors:  Donald S Likosky; Weiping Zhou; David J Malenka; William B Borden; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013 Dec 9-23       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.