Literature DB >> 21705086

Characterization of the cleavage plane in DESCemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt1, Bjoern O Bachmann, Kathrin Laaser, Claus Cursiefen, Friedrich E Kruse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define the cleavage plane between Descemet's membrane (DM) and posterior corneal stroma in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) concerning its ultrastructural and immunohistochemical characteristics.
DESIGN: Observational, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen corneoscleral buttons from donors 71.5±4.3 years of age stored in Optisol-GS and used for DMEK surgery in 15 consecutive patients.
METHODS: Endothelial cell-DM complexes (EDMs) and corresponding corneoscleral rims were investigated by transmission electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry using a panel of antibodies against adhesive matrix proteins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical characteristics of interface and cleavage plane between DM and posterior stroma.
RESULTS: Connection between DM and corneal stroma was mediated predominantly by amorphous material of the interfacial matrix and projecting stromal collagen fibers. After DM stripping, the cleavage plane was located consistently between interfacial matrix and posterior stromal collagen lamellae, providing a largely smooth anterior EDM surface exposing the interfacial zone. Interindividual variations in amount and composition of the interfacial matrix resulted in variable degrees of EDM surface irregularities and variable staining patterns for adhesive matrix proteins such as fibronectin, vitronectin, amyloid P, osteonectin/secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), fibulin-1, fibulin-2, fibulin-3, fibrillin-1, and keratoepithelin.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide evidence for the existence of a physiologic cleavage plane between the interfacial matrix, the anteriormost adhesive zone of DM, and the corneal stroma, suggesting a relatively weak attachment that can be disconnected by mechanical forces. Interindividual variations in structure and composition of the interfacial matrix may provide an explanation for the variable attachment of EDM grafts to the recipients' corneal stroma and thus may affect the postoperative clinical outcome. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21705086     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

1.  [Refractive changes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty].

Authors:  T Röck; K U Bartz-Schmidt; D Röck; E Yoeruek
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Critical endothelial procedures during posterior lamellar graft preparation and transplantation].

Authors:  T A Fuchsluger; F E Kruse; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity.

Authors:  Philip Maier; Thomas Reinhard; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Human cornea proteome: identification and quantitation of the proteins of the three main layers including epithelium, stroma, and endothelium.

Authors:  Thomas F Dyrlund; Ebbe Toftgaard Poulsen; Carsten Scavenius; Camilla Lund Nikolajsen; Ida B Thøgersen; Henrik Vorum; Jan J Enghild
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  The Ultrastructures and Mechanical Properties of the Descement's Membrane in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Dan Xia; Shuai Zhang; Esben Nielsen; Anders Ramløv Ivarsen; Chunyong Liang; Qiang Li; Karen Thomsen; Jesper Østergaard Hjortdal; Mingdong Dong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation.

Authors:  Javier Cabrerizo; Thomas Forshaw; Clara Rodriguez-Aierbe; Jesus Garrido-Fierro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Predictive Factors for Successful Type 1 Big Bubble during Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vincent M Borderie; Sara Touhami; Cristina Georgeon; Otman Sandali
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Sinsky hook assisted roll preparation (SHARP): A modified technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation.

Authors:  Prafulla K Maharana; Pranita Sahay; Jeewan S Titiyal; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-08

9.  Eye bank versus surgeon prepared DMEK tissues: influence on adhesion and re-bubbling rate.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Ahmed Kazaili; Luca Pagano; Kunal Ajit Gadhvi; Mitchell Titley; Bernhard Steger; Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto; Alvaro Meana; Jesus Merayo-Lloves; Ponzin Diego; Riaz Akhtar; Hannah J Levis; Stefano Ferrari; Stephen B Kaye; Mohit Parekh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Feasibility of cell-based therapy combined with descemetorhexis for treating Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy in rabbit model.

Authors:  Naoki Okumura; Daiki Matsumoto; Yuya Fukui; Masataka Teramoto; Hirofumi Imai; Tetta Kurosawa; Tomoki Shimada; Friedrich Kruse; Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt; Shigeru Kinoshita; Noriko Koizumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.