Dany Gagnon1, Simon Décary, Marie-France Charbonneau. 1. Pathokinesiology Laboratory, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. dany.gagnon.2@umontreal.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the timed manual wheelchair slalom test (MWST) and to quantify its test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change (MDC). DESIGN: Repeated-measures design. SETTING: Pathokinesiology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=15) with spinal cord injury (SCI) (vertebral levels, C6 to T12; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale: A, B, or C) participated in this study. Participants were 40.7±12.6 years of age, measured 1.77±.08m in height, weighed 79.6±23.9kg, and had been using a manual wheelchair as their primary mode of mobility for 5.9±7.5 years. INTERVENTIONS: Participants propelled their own wheelchair at a self-selected maximum velocity along a slalom trajectory (linear length, 18m) defined by 7 cones aligned in a straight line and set 3m, 2m, and 1m apart from one another. Three trials (T=3) of the MWST were performed on 2 separate visits (V=2) 6.3±5.4 days apart. The generalizability theory was used to determine the reliability, standard error of measurement, and MDC and to propose testing protocols for the MWST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The time needed to complete the MWST expressed in seconds. RESULTS: All participants successfully completed the MWST. No adverse effect was reported. The time required to complete the MWST at visits 1 and 2 was 16.8±4.4 and 16.5±4.3 seconds, respectively. The reliability coefficient (φ=.981) and accuracy (standard error of measurement=3.47%, MDC=8.097%) were high when the time required for a participant to perform 3 MWST trials during a single visit (T=3, V=1) was averaged. CONCLUSIONS: The timed MWST is a safe, reliable, and accurate performance-based outcome measure that can be administered easily and quickly in individuals with SCI who rely on a manually propelled wheelchair for mobility.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the timed manual wheelchair slalom test (MWST) and to quantify its test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change (MDC). DESIGN: Repeated-measures design. SETTING: Pathokinesiology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=15) with spinal cord injury (SCI) (vertebral levels, C6 to T12; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale: A, B, or C) participated in this study. Participants were 40.7±12.6 years of age, measured 1.77±.08m in height, weighed 79.6±23.9kg, and had been using a manual wheelchair as their primary mode of mobility for 5.9±7.5 years. INTERVENTIONS:Participants propelled their own wheelchair at a self-selected maximum velocity along a slalom trajectory (linear length, 18m) defined by 7 cones aligned in a straight line and set 3m, 2m, and 1m apart from one another. Three trials (T=3) of the MWST were performed on 2 separate visits (V=2) 6.3±5.4 days apart. The generalizability theory was used to determine the reliability, standard error of measurement, and MDC and to propose testing protocols for the MWST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The time needed to complete the MWST expressed in seconds. RESULTS: All participants successfully completed the MWST. No adverse effect was reported. The time required to complete the MWST at visits 1 and 2 was 16.8±4.4 and 16.5±4.3 seconds, respectively. The reliability coefficient (φ=.981) and accuracy (standard error of measurement=3.47%, MDC=8.097%) were high when the time required for a participant to perform 3 MWST trials during a single visit (T=3, V=1) was averaged. CONCLUSIONS: The timed MWST is a safe, reliable, and accurate performance-based outcome measure that can be administered easily and quickly in individuals with SCI who rely on a manually propelled wheelchair for mobility.
Authors: Samuel Amorim; Vitor Hugo Teixeira; Rui Corredeira; Maria Cunha; Bruno Maia; Paulo Margalho; Joana Pires Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Mark T Bayley; R Lee Kirby; Farnoosh Farahani; Laura Titus; Cher Smith; François Routhier; Dany H Gagnon; Patricia Stapleford; S Mohammad Alavinia; B Catharine Craven Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.985