Literature DB >> 21704429

Establishing a clinically relevant bioburden benchmark: a quality indicator for adequate reprocessing and storage of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Michelle J Alfa1, Shadi Sepehri, Nancy Olson, Alana Wald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microbiological surveillance of patient-ready flexible endoscopes has been suggested as a tool for endoscope reprocessing quality assurance. However, a proper guideline defining the performance and the frequency of monitoring procedures and specifying how to interpret the results is lacking.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All channels from the 20 flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes (5 gastroscopes, 9 colonoscopes, and 6 duodenoscopes) used at an endoscopy clinic were tested for the presence of bacteria and fungi early every Monday morning over a 7-month period.
RESULTS: Bacteria and fungi were detected in 5.7% of the 383 channels tested. Of the 141 scopes tested, 14.1% had detectable growth in at least 1 channel. No significant relationship was detected between the scope or channel type and detection of microorganisms. Over the 7 months of testing, 99.5% of scope channels consistently demonstrated <100 cfu/mL of microbial growth.
CONCLUSION: Based on our clinical findings, we recommend 100 cfu/mL as a reliable and routinely achievable cutoff for bioburden residuals in reprocessed endoscope channels. This cutoff is the same as the Canadian cutoff for dialysis water.
Copyright © 2012 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21704429     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  3 in total

1.  Rate and impact of duodenoscope contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara Larsen; Rasmus Vinther Russell; Lotte Klinten Ockert; Stephen Spanos; Helena Strømstad Travis; Lars Holger Ehlers; Anders Mærkedahl
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-15

2.  Infectious transmission from Savary dilators is uncommon: retrospective review from a large tertiary academic center.

Authors:  Zoe N Memel; Duncan J Flynn; Yasmin Hernandez-Barco; Kavel Harish Visrodia; Brenna Casey; Kumar Krishnan
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 3.  Endoscope Reprocessing: Update on Controversial Issues.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Choi; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.