Literature DB >> 21704257

Extensive increase of microarray signals in cancers calls for novel normalization assumptions.

Dong Wang1, Lixin Cheng, Mingyue Wang, Ruihong Wu, Pengfei Li, Bin Li, Yuannv Zhang, Yunyan Gu, Wenyuan Zhao, Chenguang Wang, Zheng Guo.   

Abstract

When using microarray data for studying a complex disease such as cancer, it is a common practice to normalize data to force all arrays to have the same distribution of probe intensities regardless of the biological groups of samples. The assumption underlying such normalization is that in a disease the majority of genes are not differentially expressed genes (DE genes) and the numbers of up- and down-regulated genes are roughly equal. However, accumulated evidences suggest gene expressions could be widely altered in cancer, so we need to evaluate the sensitivities of biological discoveries to violation of the normalization assumption. Here, we analyzed 7 large Affymetrix datasets of pair-matched normal and cancer samples for cancers collected in the NCBI GEO database. We showed that in 6 of these 7 datasets, the medians of perfect match (PM) probe intensities increased in cancer state and the increases were significant in three datasets, suggesting the assumption that all arrays have the same median probe intensities regardless of the biological groups of samples might be misleading. Then, we evaluated the effects of three currently most widely used normalization algorithms (RMA, MAS5.0 and dChip) on the selection of DE genes by comparing them with LVS which relies less on the above-mentioned assumption. The results showed using RMA, MAS5.0 and dChip may produce lots of false results of down-regulated DE genes while missing many up-regulated DE genes. At least for cancer study, normalizing all arrays to have the same distribution of probe intensities regardless of the biological groups of samples might be misleading. Thus, most current normalizations based on unreliable assumptions may distort biological differences between normal and cancer samples. The LVS algorithm might perform relatively well due to that it relies less on the above-mentioned assumption. Also, our results indicate that genes may be widely up-regulated in most human cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21704257     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Chem        ISSN: 1476-9271            Impact factor:   2.877


  11 in total

1.  Identification of human HK genes and gene expression regulation study in cancer from transcriptomics data analysis.

Authors:  Meili Chen; Jingfa Xiao; Zhang Zhang; Jingxing Liu; Jiayan Wu; Jun Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Functional comparison between genes dysregulated in ulcerative colitis and colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenyuan Zhao; Lishuang Qi; Yao Qin; Hongwei Wang; Beibei Chen; Ruiping Wang; Yunyan Gu; Chunyang Liu; Chenguang Wang; Zheng Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A functional module-based exploration between inflammation and cancer in esophagus.

Authors:  Nannan Liu; Chunhua Li; Yan Huang; Ying Yi; Wanlan Bo; Chunmiao Li; Yue Li; Yongfei Hu; Kongning Li; Hong Wang; Liwei Zhuang; Huihui Fan; Dong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Revealing potential molecular targets bridging colitis and colorectal cancer based on multidimensional integration strategy.

Authors:  Xu Guan; Ying Yi; Yan Huang; Yongfei Hu; Xiaobo Li; Xishan Wang; Huihui Fan; Guiyu Wang; Dong Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-10

5.  Discriminating cancer-related and cancer-unrelated chemoradiation-response genes for locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  You Guo; Jun Cheng; Lu Ao; Xiangyu Li; Qingzhou Guan; Juan Zhang; Haidan Yan; Hao Cai; Qiao Gao; Weizhong Jiang; Zheng Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Circumvent the uncertainty in the applications of transcriptional signatures to tumor tissues sampled from different tumor sites.

Authors:  Jun Cheng; You Guo; Qiao Gao; Hongdong Li; Haidan Yan; Mengyao Li; Hao Cai; Weicheng Zheng; Xiangyu Li; Weizhong Jiang; Zheng Guo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-02

7.  Differential expression analysis for individual cancer samples based on robust within-sample relative gene expression orderings across multiple profiling platforms.

Authors:  Qingzhou Guan; Rou Chen; Haidan Yan; Hao Cai; You Guo; Mengyao Li; Xiangyu Li; Mengsha Tong; Lu Ao; Hongdong Li; Guini Hong; Zheng Guo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-18

8.  Robust transcriptional tumor signatures applicable to both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and fresh-frozen samples.

Authors:  Rou Chen; Qingzhou Guan; Jun Cheng; Jun He; Huaping Liu; Hao Cai; Guini Hong; Jiahui Zhang; Na Li; Lu Ao; Zheng Guo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-24

9.  A qualitative transcriptional signature for the histological reclassification of lung squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Xin Li; Gengen Shi; Qingsong Chu; Wenbin Jiang; Yixin Liu; Sainan Zhang; Zheyang Zhang; Zixin Wei; Fei He; Zheng Guo; Lishuang Qi
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  How to do quantile normalization correctly for gene expression data analyses.

Authors:  Yaxing Zhao; Limsoon Wong; Wilson Wen Bin Goh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.