Literature DB >> 21703888

Animal welfare: at the interface between science and society.

F Ohl1, F J van der Staay.   

Abstract

The general concept of animal welfare embraces a continuum between negative/bad welfare and positive/good welfare. Early approaches to defining animal welfare were mainly based on the exclusion of negative states, neglecting the fact that during evolution animals optimised their ability to interact with and adapt to their environment(s). An animal's welfare status might best be represented by the adaptive value of the individual's interaction with a given environmental setting but this dynamic welfare concept has significant implications for practical welfare assessments. Animal welfare issues cannot simply be addressed by means of objective biological measurements of an animal's welfare status under certain circumstances. In practice, interpretation of welfare status and its translation into the active management of perceived welfare issues are both strongly influenced by context and, especially, by cultural and societal values. In assessing whether or not a given welfare status is morally acceptable, animal welfare scientists must be aware that scientifically based, operational definitions of animal welfare will necessarily be influenced strongly by a given society's moral understanding.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21703888     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  30 in total

1.  Stress in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) following overland transportation.

Authors:  Remy Manuel; Jeroen Boerrigter; Jonathan Roques; Jan van der Heul; Ruud van den Bos; Gert Flik; Hans van de Vis
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.794

2.  Assessing Accumulation of Organic Material on Rodent Cage Accessories.

Authors:  Kenneth P Allen; Tarrant J Csida; Joseph D Thulin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Automated bioacoustics: methods in ecology and conservation and their potential for animal welfare monitoring.

Authors:  Michael P Mcloughlin; Rebecca Stewart; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Assessment of One Health Knowledge, Animal Welfare Implications, and Emergency Preparedness Considerations for Effective Public Health Response.

Authors:  Linda C Pimentel; Alicia C May; John K Iskander; Ronald E Banks; John D Gibbins
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The multifactorial role of the 3Rs in shifting the harm-benefit analysis in animal models of disease.

Authors:  Melanie L Graham; Mark J Prescott
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Francisca C Velkers; Lisa Fijn; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Increasing the Awareness of Animal Welfare Science in Marine Mammal Conservation: Addressing Language, Translation and Reception Issues.

Authors:  Isabella L K Clegg; Rebecca M Boys; Karen A Stockin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Not all mice are equal: welfare implications of behavioural habituation profiles in four 129 mouse substrains.

Authors:  Hetty Boleij; Amber R Salomons; Mariska van Sprundel; Saskia S Arndt; Frauke Ohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Overnight Social Isolation in Pigs Decreases Salivary Cortisol but Does Not Impair Spatial Learning and Memory or Performance in a Decision-Making Task.

Authors:  F Josef van der Staay; Annelieke J Schoonderwoerd; Bo Stadhouders; Rebecca E Nordquist
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-01-11

10.  Effects of environmental enrichment on cognitive performance of pigs in a spatial holeboard discrimination task.

Authors:  Charlotte G E Grimberg-Henrici; Paul Vermaak; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Rebecca E Nordquist; F Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.