Literature DB >> 21703662

SIMS(DAIRY): a modelling framework to identify sustainable dairy farms in the UK. Framework description and test for organic systems and N fertiliser optimisation.

A Del Prado1, T Misselbrook, D Chadwick, A Hopkins, R J Dewhurst, P Davison, A Butler, J Schröder, D Scholefield.   

Abstract

Multiple demands are placed on farming systems today. Society, national legislation and market forces seek what could be seen as conflicting outcomes from our agricultural systems, e.g. food quality, affordable prices, a healthy environmental, consideration of animal welfare, biodiversity etc., Many of these demands, or desirable outcomes, are interrelated, so reaching one goal may often compromise another and, importantly, pose a risk to the economic viability of the farm. SIMS(DAIRY), a farm-scale model, was used to explore this complexity for dairy farm systems. SIMS(DAIRY) integrates existing approaches to simulate the effect of interactions between farm management, climate and soil characteristics on losses of nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon. The effects on farm profitability and attributes of biodiversity, milk quality, soil quality and animal welfare are also included. SIMS(DAIRY) can also be used to optimise fertiliser N. In this paper we discuss some limitations and strengths of using SIMS(DAIRY) compared to other modelling approaches and propose some potential improvements. Using the model we evaluated the sustainability of organic dairy systems compared with conventional dairy farms under non-optimised and optimised fertiliser N use. Model outputs showed for example, that organic dairy systems based on grass-clover swards and maize silage resulted in much smaller total GHG emissions per l of milk and slightly smaller losses of NO(3) leaching and NO(x) emissions per l of milk compared with the grassland/maize-based conventional systems. These differences were essentially because the conventional systems rely on indirect energy use for 'fixing' N compared with biological N fixation for the organic systems. SIMS(DAIRY) runs also showed some other potential benefits from the organic systems compared with conventional systems in terms of financial performance and soil quality and biodiversity scores. Optimisation of fertiliser N timings and rates showed a considerable scope to reduce the (GHG emissions per l milk too).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21703662     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Food Footprint as a Measure of Sustainability for Grazing Dairy Farms.

Authors:  M Melissa Rojas-Downing; A Pouyan Nejadhashemi; Behin Elahi; Kimberly A Cassida; Fariborz Daneshvar; J Sebastian Hernandez-Suarez; Mohammad Abouali; Matthew R Herman; Sabah Anwer Dawood Al Masraf; Timothy Harrigan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Modelling Farm Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Lisa M Collins; Chérie E Part
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability.

Authors:  C P A van Wagenberg; Y de Haas; H Hogeveen; M M van Krimpen; M P M Meuwissen; C E van Middelaar; T B Rodenburg
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The landscape model: A model for exploring trade-offs between agricultural production and the environment.

Authors:  Kevin Coleman; Shibu E Muhammed; Alice E Milne; Lindsay C Todman; A Gordon Dailey; Margaret J Glendining; Andrew P Whitmore
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment.

Authors:  Laura Scherer; Brian Tomasik; Oscar Rueda; Stephan Pfister
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.141

6.  Carbon Footprint Assessment of Spanish Dairy Cattle Farms: Effectiveness of Dietary and Farm Management Practices as a Mitigation Strategy.

Authors:  Ridha Ibidhi; Sergio Calsamiglia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Ruminant Farm Systems Animal Module: A Biophysical Description of Animal Management.

Authors:  Tayler L Hansen; Manfei Li; Jinghui Li; Chris J Vankerhove; Militsa A Sotirova; Juan M Tricarico; Victor E Cabrera; Ermias Kebreab; Kristan F Reed
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  A systematic review of non-productivity-related animal-based indicators of heat stress resilience in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Elena Galán; Pol Llonch; Arantxa Villagrá; Harel Levit; Severino Pinto; Agustín Del Prado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  GHG Emissions from Dairy Small Ruminants in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain), Using the ManleCO2 Simulation Model.

Authors:  Gregorio Salcedo; Oscar García; Lorena Jiménez; Roberto Gallego; Rafael González-Cano; Ramón Arias
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.