Literature DB >> 21703346

Bioavailability and variability of biphasic insulin mixtures.

Tue Søeborg1, Christian Hove Rasmussen, Erik Mosekilde, Morten Colding-Jørgensen.   

Abstract

Absorption of subcutaneously administered insulin is associated with considerable variability. Some of this variability was quantitatively explained for both soluble insulin and insulin suspensions in a recent contribution to this journal (Søeborg et al., 2009). In the present article, the absorption kinetics for mixtures of insulins is described. This requires that the bioavailability of the different insulins is considered. A short review of insulin bioavailability and a description of the subcutaneous depot thus precede the presentation of possible mechanisms associated with subcutaneous insulin degradation. Soluble insulins are assumed to be degraded enzymatically in the subcutaneous tissue. Suspended insulin crystals form condensed heaps that are assumed to be degraded from their surface by invading macrophages. It is demonstrated how the shape of the heaps affects the absorption kinetics. Variations in heap formation thus explain some of the additional variability associated with suspended insulins (e.g. NPH insulins) compared to soluble insulins. The heap model also describes how increasing concentrations of suspended insulins lead to decreasing bioavailability and lower values of Cmax. Together, the findings constitute a comprehensive, quantitative description of insulin absorption after subcutaneous administration. The model considers different concentrations and doses of soluble insulin, including rapid acting insulin analogues, insulin suspensions and biphasic insulin mixtures. The results can be used in both the development of novel insulin products and in the planning of the treatment of insulin dependent diabetic patients.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21703346     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0928-0987            Impact factor:   4.384


  6 in total

1.  Day-to-Day and Within-Day Variability in Glucose-Lowering Effect Between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine (100 U/mL and 300 U/mL): A Comparison Across Studies.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Kadriye Kaplan; Hanne L Haahr
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-26

Review 2.  Challenges and Opportunities for the Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins.

Authors:  Michael R Turner; Sathy V Balu-Iyer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Insulin induces a progressive increase in the resistance of subcutaneous tissue to fluid flow: Implications for insulin pump therapy.

Authors:  Werner Regittnig; Mathias Tschaikner; Alexandru-Cristian Tuca; Amra Simic; Jürgen Feiel; Roland Schaller-Ammann; Alexander H Licht; Miró Jungklaus; Thomas R Pieber
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 6.408

Review 4.  Impact of the mode of protraction of basal insulin therapies on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and resulting clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Chantal Mathieu
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 5.  Factors Affecting the Absorption of Subcutaneously Administered Insulin: Effect on Variability.

Authors:  A K J Gradel; T Porsgaard; J Lykkesfeldt; T Seested; S Gram-Nielsen; N R Kristensen; H H F Refsgaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.011

6.  Insulin depot absorption modeling and pharmacokinetic simulation with insulin glargine 300 U/mL
.

Authors:  Klaus Lindauer; Reinhard Becker
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.366

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.