Literature DB >> 21703078

Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.

Arthur Musakulu Kemoli1, Gladys N Opinya, Willem Evert van Amerongen, Samuel M Mwalili.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of 3 glass ionomer cement (GIC) brands and the postrestoration meal consumed on the survival rate of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations.
METHODS: A total of 804 proximal restorations were placed in primary molars by trained operators and assistants using 3 GIC brands. The materials' mixing/placement times, the room temperature and the postrestoration meal consumed by the subjects were documented. The restorations were evaluated soon after placement and after 2 years by trained and calibrated evaluators.
RESULTS: After 2 years, approximately 31% of the restorations had survived. There were no statistically significant differences in the survival rate of the restorations in relation to the GIC brands. The postrestoration meal consumed, which was of "hard consistency," was associated with significantly lower survival rate of the restorations.
CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate of the proximal restorations was not significantly affected by the glass ionomer cement brands used, but was significantly influenced by the consistency of the next meal consumed by each child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21703078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  5 in total

1.  Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R G de Amorim; J E Frencken; D P Raggio; X Chen; X Hu; S C Leal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Survival rate of approximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique for glass ionomer insertion.

Authors:  Clarissa Calil Bonifácio; Daniela Hesse; Rachel de Oliveira Rocha; Marcelo Bönecker; Daniela Prócida Raggio; W Evert van Amerongen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rafael Menezes-Silva; Sofia R Maito Velasco; Eduardo BRESCIANi; Roosevelt da Silva Bastos; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: the operator effect.

Authors:  Clarissa-Calil Bonifácio; Daniela Hesse; Marcelo Bönecker; Cor Van Loveren; W Evert Van Amerongen; Daniela-Prócida Raggio
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01

5.  The effects of ambient temperature and mixing time of glass ionomer cement material on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.

Authors:  Arthur M Kemoli
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.