Literature DB >> 21702778

Rational analyses of information foraging on the web.

Peter Pirolli1.   

Abstract

This article describes rational analyses and cognitive models of Web users developed within information foraging theory. This is done by following the rational analysis methodology of (a) characterizing the problems posed by the environment, (b) developing rational analyses of behavioral solutions to those problems, and (c) developing cognitive models that approach the realization of those solutions. Navigation choice is modeled as a random utility model that uses spreading activation mechanisms that link proximal cues (information scent) that occur in Web browsers to internal user goals. Web-site leaving is modeled as an ongoing assessment by the Web user of the expected benefits of continuing at a Web site as opposed to going elsewhere. These cost-benefit assessments are also based on spreading activation models of information scent. Evaluations include a computational model of Web user behavior called Scent-Based Navigation and Information Foraging in the ACT Architecture, and the Law of Surfing, which characterizes the empirical distribution of the length of paths of visitors at a Web site. 2005 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Year:  2005        PMID: 21702778     DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  9 in total

1.  A Novel Schema to Enhance Data Quality of Patient Safety Event Reports.

Authors:  Hong Kang; Yang Gong
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  The Web-Surf Task: A translational model of human decision-making.

Authors:  Samantha V Abram; Yannick-André Breton; Brandy Schmidt; A David Redish; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills; Peter M Todd; David Lazer; A David Redish; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Humans and insects decide in similar ways.

Authors:  Philippe Louâpre; Jacques J M van Alphen; Jean-Sébastien Pierre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task.

Authors:  Evan C Carter; Eric J Pedersen; Michael E McCullough
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-06

6.  Developing a similarity searching module for patient safety event reporting system using semantic similarity measures.

Authors:  Hong Kang; Yang Gong
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Loading… loading… The influence of download time on information search.

Authors:  Alyssa C Smith; Brandon C W Ralph; Jeremy Marty-Dugas; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow's breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot.

Authors:  Satyam Mukherjee; Daniel M Romero; Ben Jones; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Rational decision making in medicine: Implications for overuse and underuse.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Shira Elqayam; William Dale
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.431

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.