Literature DB >> 21702331

The effects of arousing negative and neutral picture stimuli on target detection in a vigilance task.

William S Helton1, Paul N Russell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to explore whether target detection in a vigilance task is influenced by task-irrelevant negative emotional and neutral picture stimuli and to test predictions derived from the boredom-mindlessness versus resource depletion accounts of vigilance performance.
BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that emotional stimuli can capture spatial attention. Research on the effect of negative emotional and neutral visual stimuli on temporal aspects of attention has not, however, been researched in detail.
METHOD: For this study, 51 participants (15 men and 36 women) were assigned at random to one of three vigilance conditions: a visual vigil with task-irrelevant negative-arousing pictures, a visual vigil with task-irrelevant neutral pictures, or a no-picture visual vigil control. Vigilance performance was assessed in all conditions.
RESULTS: Overall performance efficiency was negatively influenced by the negative-arousing pictures and was interpreted to favor resource depletion to boredom-mindlessness accounts of vigilance performance.
CONCLUSION: Task-unrelated negative emotional stimuli appear to impair absolute levels of target detections in a vigilance task. APPLICATION: In monitoring settings where negative emotional stimuli are present, the intrusion of negative emotional stimuli should be mitigated via alterations in the system design, or if this is implausible, the monitors may need additional stress coping and emotional resilience training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21702331     DOI: 10.1177/0018720811401385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  10 in total

1.  Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The impact of fear words in a secondary task on complex motor performance: a dual-task climbing study.

Authors:  Alexander L Green; Nick Draper; William S Helton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-20

3.  Working memory load and the vigilance decrement.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Post-disaster depression and vigilance: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  William S Helton; Ulrike Ossowski; Sanna Malinen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of emotional stimuli on visuo-spatial vigilance.

Authors:  Georgia Flood; Katharina Näswall; William S Helton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-13

6.  Anxiety and inattention as predictors of achievement in early elementary school children.

Authors:  Amie E Grills-Taquechel; Jack M Fletcher; Sharon R Vaughn; Carolyn A Denton; Pat Taylor
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2012-07-06

7.  The neural basis of improved cognitive performance by threat of shock.

Authors:  Salvatore Torrisi; Oliver Robinson; Katherine O'Connell; Andrew Davis; Nicholas Balderston; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Frontal cerebral oxygen response as an indicator of initial attention effort during perceptual learning.

Authors:  Michael Ong; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dopaminergic polymorphisms associated with time-on-task declines and fatigue in the Psychomotor Vigilance Test.

Authors:  Julian Lim; Richard Ebstein; Chun-Yu Tse; Mikhail Monakhov; Poh San Lai; David F Dinges; Kenneth Kwok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anticipation of Monetary Reward Can Attenuate the Vigilance Decrement.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Mallory Grosso; Guanyu Liu; Alex Mitko; Rachael Morris; Joseph DeGutis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.