Literature DB >> 21702034

Frequency of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatment in a well-screened population.

Sidsel Svennekjaer Barken1, Matejka Rebolj, Erik Søgaard Andersen, Elsebeth Lynge.   

Abstract

Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detectable at screening has helped reduce the incidence of cervical cancer, but has also led to overtreatment. The estimates of overtreatment have often focused on a particular grade of CIN or age group. The aim of this paper was to provide a nationwide population-based estimate of the frequency of CIN treatment per prevented cervical cancer case in a well-screened population. We retrieved the data from the Danish National Population, Patient, Health Insurance, Pathology, and Cancer Registers, and calculated annual age-standardized CIN treatment rates. We estimated the frequency of CIN treatment per prevented cervical cancer case by comparing the cumulative life-time risk of CIN treatment from 1996 onward, with the difference in the cumulative life-time risks of cervical cancer in the prescreening and the screening periods. Since 1996, more than 5,000 CIN treatments were undertaken annually in the population of about 2.2 million women aged 15-84 years, and at present 5.2 CIN treatments are undertaken per 1,000 women aged 20-49. About six women have undergone CIN treatment for each prevented cervical cancer. The frequency of CIN treatment increased after 2004 and at present almost eight women are treated per prevented cervical cancer case. Screening, though effective in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer, leads also to a considerable burden of CIN treatment. Future trends in CIN treatment should be closely monitored.
Copyright © 2011 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21702034     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  16 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Evolution of Premalignant Disease.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  The impact of HPV vaccination on future cervical screening: a simulation study of two birth cohorts in Denmark.

Authors:  Mie Sara Hestbech; Elsebeth Lynge; Jakob Kragstrup; Volkert Siersma; Miguel Vazquez-Prada Baillet; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  HPV prevalence and genotype distribution in a population-based split-sample study of well-screened women using CLART HPV2 human papillomavirus genotype microarray system.

Authors:  Jesper Bonde; Matejka Rebolj; Ditte Møller Ejegod; Sarah Preisler; Elsebeth Lynge; Carsten Rygaard
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Consistent condom use increases spontaneous regression in high-risk non-HPV16 but not in HPV16 CIN2-3 lesions, a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ane Cecilie Munk; Irene Tveiterås Ovestad; Einar Gudlaugsson; Kjell Løvslett; Bent Fiane; Bianca van Diermen-Hidle; Arnold-Jan Kruse; Ivar Skaland; Emiel Am Janssen; Jan Pa Baak
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.965

6.  Effect of ageing on cervical or vaginal cancer in Swedish women previously treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study of long term incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Björn Strander; Jonas Hällgren; Pär Sparén
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-01-14

7.  Protecting the underscreened women in developed countries: the value of HPV test.

Authors:  Raquel Ibáñez; Josefina Autonell; Montserrat Sardà; Nayade Crespo; Pilar Pique; Amparo Pascual; Clara Martí; Montserrat Fibla; Cristina Gutiérrez; Belén Lloveras; Judit Moreno-Crespi; Anna Torrent; Núria Baixeras; María Alejo; Francesc Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Johanne Rask; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benny Kirschner; Kirsten Rozemeijer; Jesper Bonde; Carsten Rygaard; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Management and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the Netherlands after referral for colposcopy.

Authors:  Clare A Aitken; Albert G Siebers; Suzette M Matthijsse; Erik E L Jansen; Ruud L M Bekkers; Jeroen H Becker; Bram Ter Harmsel; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Folkert J van Kemenade; Inge M C M de Kok
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Difference Between Cryotherapy and Follow Up Low Grade Squamous Lesion of Cervix Uteri.

Authors:  Mahira Jahic; Elmir Jahic; Mirsada Mulavdic; Azra Hadzimehmedovic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.