Literature DB >> 21701272

Predicting three-year kidney graft survival in recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Hongying Tang1, Mollie R Poynton, John F Hurdle, Bradley C Baird, James K Koford, Alexander S Goldfarb-Rumyantzev.   

Abstract

Predicting the outcome of kidney transplantation is important in optimizing transplantation parameters and modifying factors related to the recipient, donor, and transplant procedure. As patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to lupus nephropathy are generally younger than the typical ESRD patients and also seem to have inferior transplant outcome, developing an outcome prediction model in this patient category has high clinical relevance. The goal of this study was to compare methods of building prediction models of kidney transplant outcome that potentially can be useful for clinical decision support. We applied three well-known data mining methods (classification trees, logistic regression, and artificial neural networks) to the data describing recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) database. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUC) was used to measure the discrimination ability of the prediction models. Two groups of predictors were selected to build the prediction models. Using input variables based on Weka (a open source machine learning software) supplemented with additional variables of known clinical relevance (38 total predictors), the logistic regression performed the best overall (AUC: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.72-0.77)-significantly better (p < 0.05) than the classification trees (AUC: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.67-0.72) but not significantly better (p = 0.218) than the artificial neural networks (AUC: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.69-0.73). The performance of the artificial neural networks was not significantly better than that of the classification trees (p = 0.693). Using the more parsimonious subset of variables (six variables), the logistic regression (AUC: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.71-0.75) did not perform significantly better than either the classification tree (AUC: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.68-0.73) or the artificial neural network (AUC: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.70-0.75) models. We generated several models predicting 3-year allograft survival in kidney transplant recipients with SLE that potentially can be used in practice. The performance of logistic regression and classification tree was not inferior to more complex artificial neural network. Prediction models may be used in clinical practice to identify patients at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701272     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318222db30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  7 in total

1.  Application of Various Statistical Models to Explore Gene-Gene Interactions in Folate, Xenobiotic, Toll-Like Receptor and STAT4 Pathways that Modulate Susceptibility to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Yedluri Rupasree; Shaik Mohammad Naushad; Ravi Varshaa; Govindaraj Swathika Mahalakshmi; Konda Kumaraswami; Liza Rajasekhar; Vijay Kumar Kutala
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  ICDA: a platform for Intelligent Care Delivery Analytics.

Authors:  David Gotz; Harry Stavropoulos; Jimeng Sun; Fei Wang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

3.  Prediction of chronic damage in systemic lupus erythematosus by using machine-learning models.

Authors:  Fulvia Ceccarelli; Marco Sciandrone; Carlo Perricone; Giulio Galvan; Francesco Morelli; Luis Nunes Vicente; Ilaria Leccese; Laura Massaro; Enrica Cipriano; Francesca Romana Spinelli; Cristiano Alessandri; Guido Valesini; Fabrizio Conti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Biomarkers of erosive arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus: Application of machine learning models.

Authors:  Fulvia Ceccarelli; Marco Sciandrone; Carlo Perricone; Giulio Galvan; Enrica Cipriano; Alessandro Galligari; Tommaso Levato; Tania Colasanti; Laura Massaro; Francesco Natalucci; Francesca Romana Spinelli; Cristiano Alessandri; Guido Valesini; Fabrizio Conti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of Salivary Indoxyl Sulfate with Proteinuria for Predicting Graft Deterioration in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Natalia Korytowska; Aleksandra Wyczałkowska-Tomasik; Leszek Pączek; Joanna Giebułtowicz
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 6.  A systematic review of the applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  I S Stafford; M Kellermann; E Mossotto; R M Beattie; B D MacArthur; S Ennis
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-09

Review 7.  Role of Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Qiongjing Yuan; Haixia Zhang; Tianci Deng; Shumei Tang; Xiangning Yuan; Wenbin Tang; Yanyun Xie; Huipeng Ge; Xiufen Wang; Qiaoling Zhou; Xiangcheng Xiao
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.