Literature DB >> 21701270

Levitronix CentriMag third-generation magnetically levitated continuous flow pump as bridge to solution.

Antonio Loforte1, Andrea Montalto, Federico Ranocchi, Paola Lilla Della Monica, Giovanni Casali, Angela Lappa, Carlo Contento, Francesco Musumeci.   

Abstract

The Levitronix CentriMag (Levitronix LLC, Waltham, MA) ventricular assist device (VAD) is a magnetically levitated rotary pump designed for temporary extracorporeal support. Between February 2004 and May 2010, 42 consecutive adult patients were supported with Levitronix at our institution (32 men; age 62.3 ± 10.5 years, range: 31-76 years). Indications for support were (group A, n = 37) failure to wean from the cardiopulmonary bypass in the setting of postcardiotomy (n = 23), primary donor graft failure (n = 4), or right ventricular failure after axial left VAD (LVAD) placement (n = 10) and (group B, n = 5) refractory heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. The mean support time was 11.2 ± 6.8 days (range: 3-43 days) in group A and 8.6 ± 4.3 days (range: 5-11 days) in group B. In the postcardiotomy cohort (group A), 11 (47.8%) patients were weaned from support as all were supported graft failure patients. Eight patients of axial LVAD cohort were weaned from right VAD (RVAD). One patient was bridged to heart transplantation (Htx). Thirteen (35.1%) patients died on support in group A. In group B, one patient was bridged to Htx and four died on support. In overall population, bleeding requiring reoperation occurred in 15 (35.7%) cases and cerebral major events in four (9.5%). There were no device failures. Of the 23 (54.7%) patients who recovered and were discharged home, 20 (47.6%) are presently alive, and additionally, two patients of both groups who were bridged to Htx (overall n = 22, 52.3%). The Levitronix proved to be useful in patients previously considered nonsuitable for transplantation or long-term assist device. The device was technically easy to manage, and the results were encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701270     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31821f2116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current status of extracorporeal ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Nishimura
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Bridge-to-decision therapy with a continuous-flow external ventricular assist device in refractory cardiogenic shock of various causes.

Authors:  Hiroo Takayama; Lori Soni; Bindu Kalesan; Lauren K Truby; Takeyoshi Ota; Sophia Cedola; Zain Khalpey; Nir Uriel; Paolo Colombo; Donna M Mancini; Ulrich P Jorde; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Successful Management of Thrombosis of the Proximal Aorta after Implantation with a Biventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Mark J Russo; Claudia Gidea; Ravi Karanam; David A Baran; Craig R Saunders; Mark J Zucker; Margarita T Camacho
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-12

Review 4.  Temporary Right-Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdelshafy; Kadir Caliskan; Goksel Guven; Ahmed Elkoumy; Hagar Elsherbini; Hesham Elzomor; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Sakir Akin; Osama Soliman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Thoratec CentriMag for temporary treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock or severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Oleg Borisenko; Gillian Wylie; John Payne; Staffan Bjessmo; Jon Smith; Nizar Yonan; Richard Firmin
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.