Literature DB >> 21701036

Interventional radiology in the management of abdominal collections after distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective review.

Carmel G Cronin1, Debra A Gervais, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo, Peter R Mueller, Ronald S Arellano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the technical and clinical success and complications of imaging-guided percutaneous catheter drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and February 2009, the cases of patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy were selected from a surgical database, and the cases of those who underwent subsequent interventional radiologic percutaneous drainage were identified. Details of percutaneous catheter drainage were recorded, and technical and clinical success was determined. Technical success was defined as successful percutaneous imaging-guided placement of a drainage catheter. Primary clinical success was defined as resolution of peripancreatic fluid collection with percutaneous drainage only. Secondary clinical success was defined as resolution of peripancreatic fluid collection with percutaneous drainage and additional manipulations (i.e., tube repositioning, additional catheter drainage) and no surgical débridement. Multifactor logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of drain failure.
RESULTS: Between January 2001 and February 2009, 365 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. Of these, 51 patients (14%; 25 men, 26 women; mean age, 53.4 years; range, 18-81 years) underwent 57 CT-guided percutaneous procedures for drainage of postsurgical peripancreatic fluid collection. The mean interval between surgery and drainage was 23.5 days (median, 17 days; range, 2-120 days), and the mean collection size was 7.3 cm in transverse dimension (median, 6.9 cm; range, 2.3-16 cm). The mean duration of catheter drainage was 39.7 days (median, 24 days; range, 3-220 days). The technical success rate was 100%, primary clinical success rate was 60%, and primary and secondary clinical success rates together were 95%. Three of the 51 patients (6%) needed surgery for definitive management of the collection. One of 51 patients (2%) had a complication of the interventional radiologic procedure. Catheter size and the need for additional catheter manipulation were significantly associated with drainage failure (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Catheter drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy is a technically safe and clinically effective procedure. Although extra manipulations may be needed to achieve clinical success, the combined primary and secondary clinical success rates are high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701036     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

Review 1.  Abscess drainage.

Authors:  Hearns W Charles
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Do Drains Contribute to Pancreatic Fistulae? Analysis of over 5000 Pancreatectomy Patients.

Authors:  R El Khoury; C Kabir; V K Maker; M Banulescu; M Wasserman; A V Maker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  EUS-Guided Transrectal Evacuation of Organized Pelvic Collection Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failure of Radiological and Surgical Approach.

Authors:  Gianfranco Donatelli; Jean-Loup Dumont; Fabrizio Cereatti; Bruto Randone; Bruno Meduri; Panagiotis Lainas; Hadrien Tranchart; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Ablative, Endovascular, and Biliary Interventions for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anne C Hevert; Collin G Howser; Michael L Gould; Daniel B Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  [Endoscopic management of complications in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system and the tracheobronchial tree].

Authors:  Konstantinos Kouladouros; Georg Kähler
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-10-21

6.  Patient's characteristics, management practices and outcome of re-laparotomies in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania.

Authors:  Andrew Y Swallow; Larry O Akoko; Leonard E Lema
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-07-04

Review 7.  Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Yong-Jian Jiang; Ji Li; Feng Yang; Yang Di; Lie Yao; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Aycan Uysal; Emre Unal; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoglu; Ronald Arellano; Turkmen Turan Ciftci; Devrim Akinci; Okan Akhan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Alternative uses of lumen apposing metal stents.

Authors:  Prabin Sharma; Thomas R McCarty; Ankit Chhoda; Antonio Costantino; Caroline Loeser; Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Marvin Ryou; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Imaging in pediatric small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  Nadir Khan; Grace S Phillips; Matthew T Heller; Leann E Linam; Shawn E Parnell; Mariam Moshiri; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.